Laserfiche WebLink
 <br /> Opportunity to design our future—think the process will do it. Heading on right path. Also on <br />CRG and learned there is a desire for civil discourse, and that was a place for it to happen. It’s <br />amazing how much CRG agrees on general concept; acknowledge not to weeds yet. (Belcher) <br /> <br /> CRG remarkable process but not always fun and games. Quotes from process. note opposing <br />points of view, those who want more data versus those that have to go on. Commend LG and JR <br />for process. (Farr) <br /> <br /> This is a mandate to go through process. hope that CRG gives CC good recommendations—think <br />we’ve given the community opportunity to weigh in re their priorities. All want CE to be good place <br />to live. (Ortiz) <br /> <br /> CRG creates space for something to come out that wasn’t there before and breaks down winner <br />takes all notion. (Zelenka) <br /> <br /> Not on CRG but heard positive and negative. Think many people unaware of this process. (Taylor) <br /> <br /> Envision Eugene major undertaking for shaping city future. Worry process will bog down reaching <br />product. Don’t think all will agree but hope all can live with. (Poling) <br /> <br /> Member of CRG. Staff worked to bring many voices together and have been happy to see. con- <br />cerned about deadline. (Clark) <br /> <br /> Attending CRG meetings and have come to appreciate group in all ways mentioned. emphasize <br />importance of well-thought out process and decision and predict CC will be able to make good deci- <br />sion and vet them with public in timely way. (Jerome) <br /> <br /> See Envision Eugene and CRG as separate.(r) recall WEC ® think people want the same thing. <br />Agree see light at the end of the tunnel. Think Envision Eugene will do that . CRG small part of ef- <br />fort. ® see Envision Eugene as being long-term vision. <br /> <br /> Impressed with expertise, intelligence, variety of voices at CRG. Collective wisdom has helped us <br />over hurdles. Communication key—people see they have lots in common—note focus on careful <br />and selective UGB expansion. Note connection jobs and expansion – do we want young families <br />here and do we want to provide homes for young people. Hopeful will be able to come up with rec- <br />ommendations but acknowledge gap between concepts and implementation (Vaughn) <br /> <br /> Emphasize accessibility of process to average people. Requires more time for sincere participation <br />but acknowledge need to keep moving—think process allows for participation while still moving <br />(Pryor) <br /> <br /> Impatience with process—time to get to the maps. Speed that up, less process, more technical <br />expertise. Acknowledge why manager chose route but fear will get to February and we won’t be <br />there. (Brown) <br /> <br /> Ambitious timeline – did not think enough but acknowledge state mandate and we’re doing the best <br />we can. Fear we won’t have concrete options too. there can be bridge building—find encouraging. <br />(Warnes) <br /> <br /> Envision Eugene one of the most important conversations we’ll have for all the reasons stated. <br />CRG—purpose for us to make a good decision for the community talking to CRG about landing in <br />new spots-places we have not been before, someplace that could accommodate all viewpoints and <br />perspectives, doing that really requires individual and collective learning. <br /> <br />City Manager Ruiz shared a framework for decision making and some examples of how the framework <br />would be used. <br /> <br />Ms. Medary solicited clarifying questions. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Mr. Zelenka, City Manager Ruiz intent is to have tradeoffs for the council to <br />consider. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—City Council November 22, 2010 Page 2 <br /> <br />