Laserfiche WebLink
<br />review or inspect, whichever is later; and requires the Attorney General to develop <br />training materials to educate public employees on public meetings law requirements. <br /> <br /> Staff Recommendation: Priority 3, Oppose (By: Jerry Lidz and Beth Forrest) <br /> IGR Committee Vote: Priority 3, Support (1/2, Clark / Poling, Taylor No) <br /> <br /> (See page 18 of the January 26, IGR Bill Report for staff comments.) <br /> <br />SB 0146: This bill would extend the scope of the Residential Service Protection Fund surcharge to include <br />fixed interconnected voice over Internet protocol service and prepaid telecommunications service. <br /> <br /> Staff Recommendation: Priority 2, Support (By: Pam Berrian) <br /> IGR Committee Vote: Neutral (1/2, Clark / Poling, Taylor No) <br /> <br /> (See page 22-23 of the January 26, IGR Bill Report for staff comments.) <br /> <br />SB 0186: This bill would require that a person seeking to appeal a land use decision or a limited land use <br />decision to the Land Use Board of Appeals must own or have ownership interest in, real <br />property within (blank ) miles of the real property affected by decision. <br /> <br /> Staff Recommendation: Neutral (By Jerry Lidz and Steve Nystrom) <br /> IGR Committee Vote: Priority 3, Support (2/1, Clark, Poling / Taylor, No) <br /> <br /> (See page 23 of the January 26, IGR Bill Report for staff comments.) <br /> <br />HB 2181: This bill would modify the attorney fee provisions related to review of decision of local <br />government before the Land Use Board of Appeals. <br /> <br /> Staff Recommendation: Priority 2, Oppose (By Jerry Lidz and Steve Nystrom) <br /> IGR Committee Vote: Priority 2, Support (2/1, Clark, Poling / Taylor, No) <br /> <br /> (See page 7 of the January 26, IGR Bill Report for staff comments.) <br /> <br />HB 2182: This bill would modify the basis for petitioning the Land Use Board of Appeals for review of a <br />land use decision or limited land use decision. <br /> <br /> Staff Recommendation: Neutral (By Steve Nystrom) <br /> IGR Committee Vote: Priority 3, Support (2/1 Clark, Poling / Taylor, No) <br /> <br /> (See pages 7-8 of the January 26, IGR Bill Report for staff comments.) <br /> <br />February 2, 2011: <br /> <br />SB 0542: This bill would expand the definition of “tourism-related facility” to include roads that <br />serve tourist destinations for the purposes of transient lodging taxes. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: Priority 2 Support / Neutral (By Larry Hill and Mike Magee) <br /> IGR Committee Vote: Priority 3, Oppose (2/1, Clark, Poling / Taylor, No) <br /> \\Cesrv500\cc support\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M110214\S1102143.doc <br /> <br /> <br />