Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />(See page 33 of the January 26 Bill Report for staff comments – held over until February 2.) <br /> <br />HB 2231: This bill would increase the cigarette tax. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: Priority 1 Support (By Larry Hill) <br /> IGR Committee Vote: Monitor (2/1, Clark, Poling / Taylor, No) <br /> <br />(See page 6 of the February 2, IGR Bill Report for staff comments.) <br /> <br />HB 2352: This bill would require cities that reduce available prime industrial land within their urban growth <br />boundaries to replace land or mitigate impacts so that development capacity to satisfy needs for <br />prime industrial land is not reduced or compromised. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: Priority 3, Oppose (By Steve Nystrom) <br /> IGR Committee Vote: Monitor (2/1, Poling, Clark / Taylor, No) <br /> <br />(See page 7 - 8 of the February 2, IGR Bill Report for staff comments.) <br /> <br />HB 2586: This bill would classify exemptions from ad valorem property tax as funds of a public <br />agency for the purpose of requiring payment of prevailing wage. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: Priority 3, Oppose (By Larry Hill and Denny Braud) <br /> IGR Committee Vote: Priority 2, Support (1/2, Taylor / Poling, Clark No) <br /> <br />(See page 19 -20 of the February 2, IGR Bill Report for staff comments.) <br /> <br />HB 2609: This bill would require metropolitan service districts and cities with populations of 25,000 or <br /> more that are outside metropolitan service districts to provide rolling, five-year supplies of shovel <br />ready buildable lands for needed housing and for industrial and commercial uses. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: Priority 2, Oppose (By Steve Nystrom) <br /> IGR Committee Vote: Monitor (2/1, Clark, Poling / Taylor, No) <br /> <br />(See page 20 – 21 of the February 2, IGR Bill Report for staff comments.) <br /> <br />HB 2624: This bill would modify the definition of “public works” and classify exemptions from ad valorem <br />property tax as funds of public agency for purpose of requiring payment of prevailing wage. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: Priority 2, Oppose (By Larry Hill and Denny Braud) <br /> IGR Committee Vote: Priority 2, Support (1/2, Taylor / Poling, Clark No) <br /> <br />(See page 23 – 24 of the February 2, IGR Bill Report for staff comments.) <br /> <br />HB 2628: This bill would define “funds of a public agency” for purposes of applying prevailing <br />wage to public projects, to include tax credits or tax abatements that a contractor receives <br />from the state in connection with a project. <br /> \\Cesrv500\cc support\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M110214\S1102143.doc <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />