Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />ECC <br />UGENE ITY OUNCIL <br />AIS <br />GENDA TEM UMMARY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Joint Work Session with Planning Commission: Envision Eugene - Strategies and Tactics <br /> <br />Meeting Date: February 16, 2011 Agenda Item Number: A <br />Department: Planning and Development Staff Contact: Lisa Gardner <br />www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 541-682-5208 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br /> <br />Envision Eugene is a collaborative community-based effort to balance the sustainability triple-bottom- <br />line framework of social equity, environmental stewardship and economic prosperity in planning for <br />34,000 new residents anticipated in the next 20 years. This work session provides an opportunity for the <br />City Council and Planning Commission to continue their joint review of the full set of strategies and <br />tactics. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />The City is legally required to provide enough residential, commercial and industrial land to <br />accommodate 20 years of growth, and establish a Eugene-only urban growth boundary (UGB). Equally <br />important, Envision Eugene is describing how we want to grow; creating a future picture of what <br />Eugene will look like, and how we will accomplish council and community goals for social equity, <br />environmental stewardship and economic prosperity. <br /> <br />During previous work sessions, the City Council was introduced to the triple-bottom-line framework and <br />the relationship between each of the three elements of the framework and Envision Eugene, as well as <br />how they serve as a foundation and inform upcoming discussions. At the last joint work session, on <br />February 9, the City Council and Planning Commission began an overview of the pillars, strategies and <br />tactics (Attachment A). <br /> <br />The strategies are organized by pillar, and accompanied by one or more tactics, which are the actions <br />that must be taken to successfully implement a strategy. If tactics are not approved concurrently with a <br />strategy, “phantom capacity” is created, and the strategy is not a viable means of satisfying the land need <br />within the current UGB. <br /> <br />The majority of these strategies focus on accommodating future housing and employment growth within <br />the existing urban growth boundary (UGB), which is consistent not only with state law, but also with <br />community values. If all of the projected residential, commercial and industrial land need cannot be <br />accommodated within the existing UGB, then any unmet need will be earmarked for UGB expansion. <br /> <br />Like the pillars, the strategies and tactics were informed by a variety of sources including public <br />meetings and open houses, youth art contests, staff research, boards and commissions, and the <br />Community Resource Group best outcomes and comments. The large collection of ideas from these <br /> \\Cesrv500\cc support\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M110216\S110216A.doc <br /> <br />