Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Zelenka had not initially supported the exclusion zone and was skeptical about it. However, he <br />would support extending the ordinance pending receipt of the commission's review. <br />Speaking to Councilor Brown's comments, Councilor Zelenka pointed out the commission could only do <br />so much work in the time given and the council had asked it to review the taser policy, which took <br />considerable commission time and energy. He considered the extension a procedural rather than a <br />substantive issue. He wanted to know who was excluded for what, and for how long. He was also curious <br />to know how one discerned the difference between the effect of the exclusion zone and the other things <br />going on. He was also concerned about the constitutionality of the ordinance and noted that he had asked <br />that Judge Allen be contacted for his input. <br />Councilor Clark welcomed any recommendations from Judge Allen. He pointed out that the penalty <br />involved was a civil penalty that mimicked, and was similar to, an anti - stalking order or restraining order, <br />to keep people who might potentially hurt someone from that person. He thought that was an appropriate <br />way to consider the zone. <br />Councilor Brown said he was a downtown business owner who was well aware of the problems that <br />downtown experienced. He was sympathetic to the idea behind the exclusion ordinance and knew exactly <br />where people were coming from. He had many of the same experiences. He just did not think the <br />ordinance was the right approach. He had deep- seated concerns about the loss of civil rights, but <br />reiterated he understood the intent behind the ordinance. <br />Mayor Piercy said the council was not voting on the merits of the zone but rather to extend the time the <br />ordinance was in effect. She hoped the report the council heard provided better direction in regard to the <br />due process issue. <br />Roll call vote; the motion passed, 6:2; Councilor Taylor and Councilor Brown voting no. <br />Mayor Piercy adjourned the meeting of the City Council and convened a meeting of the Urban Renewal <br />Agency (URA). <br />S. ACTION: <br />Urban Renewal Commitment of Riverfront Research Resolution 5011 Adopting a <br />Supplemental Budget; Making Appropriations for the City of Eugene for the Fiscal Year <br />Beginning July 1, 2009, and Ending June 30, 2010 <br />Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to direct the Agency Director to <br />commit to the use of Riverfront Urban Renewal District funds as the match for the TIGER <br />II grant application and include the matching funds on the next supplemental budget after <br />and if the grant is approved. <br />Councilor Ortiz wanted to ensure that the improvements to Highway 99 were on the list for United Fund <br />funding efforts. Mr. Inerfeld said that staff intended to put it on the list as requested. He indicated that <br />staff found the project was not the right fit for TIGER II funding. Councilor Ortiz thought it was <br />important to act while ODOT was working on the road. <br />Mr. Inerfeld responded to questions from Councilor Brown clarifying the details of the project to be <br />funded with the grant. <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council August 9, 2010 Page 6 <br />Regular Meeting <br />