Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Brown indicated he was unable to support the expenditure, preferring to keep the money in the <br />district for a district - specific project. He suggested the City could use the money on a new city hall on the <br />Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) property, for example. <br />Councilor Zelenka supported the project, pointing out that planning was necessary before the <br />infrastructure investment, and the funding set the stage for further work. <br />Mayor Piercy said the proposal was another step in a plan that the council had in motion and the National <br />Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process was essential before the project could move forward. She also <br />noted that the project was one of the types of projects envisioned in the Livable Cities legislation passed <br />by Congress the previous week. <br />Councilor Taylor did not generally support the diversion of General Fund money to urban renewal but <br />since the money was already there and the project seemed worthwhile, she would support it. <br />Councilor Brown said that the Challenge Grant funds were already taken care of. If he thought the use of <br />urban renewal was necessary for the housing element of the project, he would support it, but the money <br />was going for matching dollars for the TIGER II grant. For that reason, he opposed it. He would not <br />oppose land - banking for low- income housing. <br />Councilor Clark noted the high priority the council placed on the Beltline project and asked if the TIGER <br />II grants could be used to realize that project in a quicker fashion. Mr. Inerfeld said the grant program was <br />geared toward mixed -use development and multi -modal transportation, and the Beltline project had not <br />seemed like the right fit. The City had requested federal funding for the Beltline project. <br />Councilor Clark asked if the timeline for the two projects would be very different. Mr. Inerfeld said that it <br />depended on the receipt of funding. The City needed to work with the Oregon Department of <br />Transportation to find more money for the NEPA process for Beltline but he thought the challenge would <br />be getting the facility plan approved. <br />Roll call vote; the motion passed, 7:1; Councilor Brown voting no. <br />Mayor Piercy adjourned the meeting of the URA and reconvened the meeting of the City Council. <br />9. WORK SESSION: <br />Police Auditor Evaluation Process <br />The council was joined by Human Resources Director Alana Holmes, who reviewed the options before <br />the council for evaluating Police Auditor Mark Gissiner. <br />Councilor Clark liked the criteria from the previous evaluation as a starting point. He wanted to see the <br />community stakeholder feedback first. He wanted to keep the criteria rankings for this year's evaluation, <br />but wanted to move toward the four point metric used in the City Manager's evaluation to more <br />mechanically and fairly evaluate the auditor. He asked if the panel could be done this year. Ms. Holmes <br />said yes, and said there were other sources for feedback that also made sense. <br />MINUTES — Eugene City Council August 9, 2010 Page 7 <br />Regular Meeting <br />