My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 01/11/11 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2011
>
CC Minutes - 01/11/11 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2012 11:24:50 AM
Creation date
3/3/2011 1:14:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/11/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Speaking to the proposed West Eugene EmX extension, Mr. Rubin objected that LTD was making service <br />reductions while planning to increase its budget by $1 million to underwrite the costs of West Eugene <br />EmX service. He did not consider the project sustainable because of that and suggested that the City ask <br />LTD to identify the source of funding for future West Eugene EmX operations now. He did not think the <br />payroll tax increase would be sufficient to operate the route in the future. He also believed LTD should <br />identify now the areas it was contemplating for future reductions. <br />Mr. Rubin did not accept LTD's contention that EmX represented increased service in West Eugene, <br />pointing out it would have fewer stops a greater distance apart than the current system. He objected to the <br />fact that LTD had never tried an express service on West l 1 1h Avenue although it clearly had the <br />advertising budget to promote such an express, as evidenced by its advertising in support of the West 11 th <br />Avenue EmX project. He believed LTD had lost sight of its real mission in its desire to secure Federal <br />Transit Agency (FTA) funds. He did not think congestion would be solved by a giant bus, and pointed <br />out that existing park and rides on along West 1 l Avenue were not used to capacity. He said that <br />forecasts can be wrong, and planners can issue rosy but wrong projections. <br />Keith Edding, 1970 Columbia Street, called for open and honest discussion of the status of school <br />funding as the reductions being contemplated by Eugene School District 4J would damage the schools, <br />erode public confidence, and erode Eugene's positive reputation as a place to live and do business. He <br />moved to Eugene in part because of the solid reputation of the public schools. His daughter was getting a <br />reasonable education but had large classes and was losing time to furlough days. He believed conditions <br />would worsen as a result of the draconian reductions he anticipated the district would adopt and as a result <br />the district's schools would not meet State requirements. He called on the council to exercise its <br />leadership and refer a City income tax devoted to K -12 to the voters. <br />Pete Mandrapa, 4120 West Amazon Street, a retired teacher, said he moved to Eugene because of the <br />reputation of its schools. He said in the 1970s and 1980s he worked in an exemplary school system <br />where teachers and students were well- supported. Things had changed with the passage of Ballot <br />Measure 5 when funding responsibility for the schools was shifted to State government. The State <br />income tax was a more volatile source of funding than the property tax. During the 1990s the school <br />system started going downhill and class sizes began increasing. He supported a City income tax because <br />the community needed to do something about the funding shortfall in the short-term while the State <br />worked toward a long -term solution. <br />Josef Siekiel - Zdzienicki, 1025 Taylor Street, indicated support for an income tax dedicated to K -12 <br />education. Speaking to the proposed West Eugene EmX route, Mr. Siekiel - Zdzienicki said that LTD <br />wanted a 15 -foot easement in much of the 61 -mile route that it planned. That added up to a lot of <br />easements, and he thought the public should be alerted to that. He called for synchronization of Envision <br />Eugene and the EmX route planning effort. He said that every property owner living along all the <br />transportation corridors being discussed should be notified of the potential impact of the Envision Eugene <br />process and he promised that many people would show up to share their concerns. He believed that <br />having the policy discussion now would avoid the need to have the same discussion later for the other <br />corridors. <br />Jeff Morton, 93103 Powerline Road, said he owned the Boulevard Grill and also had children in the local <br />schools. While he appreciated the cause, Mr. Morton did not support a sales tax on restaurants because <br />people would either spend less or opt out of dining in restaurants altogether. As a result, unemployment <br />could rise in the food service industry. He pointed out that the community was already seeing a trend <br />toward limited menus and food carts due to the lower costs of those businesses. Restaurant profit margins <br />were thin, particularly for non - franchise restaurant owners. <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council January 11, 2010 Page 2 <br />Regular Meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.