My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 01/11/11 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2011
>
CC Minutes - 01/11/11 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2012 11:24:50 AM
Creation date
3/3/2011 1:14:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/11/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Morton suggested a second unintended consequence to such a tax was that Springfield restaurants <br />would have a competitive advantage over Eugene restaurants. He also asked the council to consider the <br />timing of such a tax. Businesses were struggling through the recession and were beginning to crawl back. <br />He asked why the City would want to kick business when it was down and chose one industry to bear the <br />load. Mr. Morton offered to share his bottom line with the council. <br />Joel Pomerantz, 1171 Risden Place, represented the Oregon Restaurant Lobbying Association. He did <br />not minimize the education budget shortfall but suggested that it was an issue that belonged to the entire <br />community. He believed a City tax on prepared foods would be unfair. Most tax revenues would be <br />collected by lower price restaurants visited by low- income families with multiple jobs and no time to <br />cook, and such a tax would be regressive in nature. Meal taxes had to be collected in both traditional <br />restaurants, grocery stores, convenience stores, food carts, and where ever food was sold. Such a tax <br />would unfairly target the food sales industry. It should not be the only community industry at risk. Mr. <br />Pomerantz said that restaurants have small profit margins and losing a percentage of sales would put <br />business at risk. Most restaurants owners were just hanging on. <br />Kimberly Gladen, 361 West Broadway, #4, suggested a restaurant tax or flat income tax would hurt low - <br />wage earners. She asked the council to consider who it was taxing. She said that such taxes took <br />homeless families further away from being in a home. Her neighbors dreamed about having more space <br />for their children, but taxing their incomes and their restaurant meals took them farther away from that <br />dream as well. Such taxes also hurt the mentally ill and the disabled, who often held jobs. Ms. Gladen <br />suggested the only fair tax would be on higher income earners who had enjoyed large federal tax breaks <br />and advantages that the low- income did not have. She considered cell phones, computers, and cars one <br />did not live in to be luxury items for the rich. Taxing her income would be unfair and taxing those poorer <br />than her would be even more unfair. She said the City should consider who such a tax might hurt. <br />Jack Radey, 2230 Garfield Street, questioned LTD's use of public funds to conduct a radio campaign in <br />support of the West Eugene EmX extension. Mr. Brady's review of the information related to the <br />extension and the response to his questions of LTD staff about the project led him to conclude that a "sell <br />job" was occurring. Mr. Radey said that the facts cited by LTD did not stand up well to close <br />examination. LTD seemed to have selected the projections that best supported its argument of need. He <br />questioned how LTD could maintain such a system given the status of its budget and objected to the <br />lesser service that he perceived would be delivered on West 11` Avenue as a result. <br />Wendy Butler Boyson, 1265 City View Street, expressed her support for the proposed West Eugene <br />EmX extension. She described her own use of the first phase of EmX system in support of her remarks. <br />She believed the ridership on the existing EmX system spoke for itself. She said the buses were <br />frequently full. Ms. Butler Boyson went on to aver that once the community provided fast and easy <br />transportation in the form of the EmX system, people with cars would use the system to get to the places <br />they wanted to go. She did not think that concerns about construction concerns should be an issue for the <br />businesses along West 11` Avenue because of LTD's mitigation plans. <br />Charles Hibberd, a West 11"' Avenue business owner, suggested that EmX between Eugene and <br />Springfield was successful because it ran between two hubs. He questioned the sustainability of the <br />proposed extension because he did not think LTD would be able to maintain it or support it into the future <br />without causing damage or depletion of a resource. In this instance, the resource was the businesses on <br />West 11` Avenue. None of them were supportive of bus travel. People did not travel to Home Depot on <br />the bus to buy wood. He located his business in the corridor because it was a busy street and people came <br />to do businesses in their automobiles. He suggested that the businesses on West 11"' Avenue represented <br />MINUTES — Eugene City Council January 11, 2010 Page 3 <br />Regular Meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.