Laserfiche WebLink
4. ACTION: Adoption of Resolution 1058 Acknowledging Receipt of the Annual Financial <br />Report of the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Eugene, Oregon, for the Fiscal Year <br />Ending June 30, 2010 <br />City Manager Jon Ruiz reported that the resolution acknowledged receipt of the Annual Financial Report <br />for the agency and demonstrated the City's compliance with State law. <br />Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Brown, moved to adopt Resolution 1058 <br />acknowledging receipt of the Annual Financial Report for the Urban Renewal Agency of <br />the City of Eugene for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. Roll call vote: The motion <br />passed unanimously, 7:0. <br />Mayor Piercy adjourned the meeting of the Eugene Urban Renewal Agency and reconvened a meeting of <br />the Eugene City Council. <br />5. WORK SESSION: 4J and Bethel Budget Shortfall <br />City Manager Ruiz introduced the item. He acknowledged the financial shortfalls that the 4J and Bethel <br />school districts faced and the community interest that had been expressed in finding funding solutions. <br />Many had suggested the City could assist the districts by placing a new revenue measure for schools on <br />the May 2011 ballot. He said that for such a measure to be placed on the ballot, staff would need council <br />direction on February 14, 2011 <br />Twylla Miller of the Central Services Department provided the staff report. She noted the suggestions for <br />a restaurant or personal income tax to be placed on the May ballot, and said other taxing options were also <br />analyzed in the agenda item summary provided to the council. She cautioned that the revenue estimates <br />were based on older data and staff would work with an economist to refine the estimates if the council <br />chose to move forward with one. <br />Ms. Miller recommended that the council consider the current economic environment, Eugene funding <br />priorities, and the plans of other jurisdictions when making its decision. County and State government <br />faced shortfalls at a time of increased demand, and the City had unfunded priorities that included the <br />General Fund shortfall, ambulance transport funding, and parks operation and maintenance funding. The <br />stability of the revenue source and its ease of administration also needed to be considered. Ms. Miller <br />said the City lacked a collection mechanism but it was possible it could piggyback on the State income <br />tax collection mechanism. There were also timing issues to consider. She called attention to an election <br />sequencing timeline included in the meeting packet and noted that the deadline for the May ballot was <br />February 15. <br />Ms. Miller reviewed a series of council decision points, including: <br />1. Should Eugene pursue a new revenue source at this time? <br />2. If so, which revenue source should be pursued? <br />3. What is the target amount of revenue generation from that source? <br />4. Should any City services be included in the revenue package? <br />5. Should the measure be placed on the ballot, or implemented under the City's home rule <br />authority? <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council January 11, 2010 Page 6 <br />Regular Meeting <br />