Laserfiche WebLink
6 Should there be a public opinion survey prior to placing a measure on the ballot? <br />Mayor Piercy called on the council for questions and comments, noting the first question before the <br />council was whether to pursue such a revenue measure at this time. <br />Ms. Ortiz said she wanted to first know if such a measure would make a difference to the schools. In <br />response, 4J School District Superintendent George Russell indicated that an annual $10 million would <br />assist the district through the next few years. Bethel Superintendent Colt Gill said Bethel's shortfall was <br />estimated to be $4 to $7.5 million annually, and any revenue coming to the district would be helpful. <br />Ms. Ortiz understood the districts were considering operating levies and asked if the superintendents <br />believed they would also be able to pass those levies if the City placed a measure on the ballot. <br />Superintendent Russell indicated that the 4J School District Board of Directors would have to discuss <br />that. He had recommended the 4J board refer a $130 million bond measure to the voters in May 2011. <br />Superintendent Gill said that he had also recommended a general obligation bond measure of between <br />$10 million and $12 million to his board. Preliminary polling had been positive, but it had occurred <br />before discussion of a City tax measure. <br />Mayor Piercy said those advocating for the measure wanted to help the schools and alleviate reductions <br />that would increase class size and furlough days. She asked if the superintendents perceived the proposal <br />the council was being asked to consider as helpful or a problem in terms of what the districts were trying <br />to accomplish. Superintendent Gill suggested the Bethel board needed to discuss that question. He said <br />the issue was complicated by a lack of information about the revenue to be received and the reductions <br />that had already been implemented, which included negotiated concessions from employee groups. He <br />did not know how the revenues would be used, but believed that those who supported such a measure <br />anticipated it would reduce class sizes and restoring contract agreements. <br />Superintendent Russell agreed with Superintendent Gill. He said the 4J board would have to discuss the <br />issue. If such a measure were to pass, the revenues would have to be targeted to address certain <br />community concerns, such as class size and the length of the instructional year. <br />Mayor Piercy asked when the districts would need to know the details of any revenue proposal in order to <br />have a board discussion. Superintendent Russell said he would make some final recommendations to the <br />school board the following day about the reductions it needed to make in the next school year. Any <br />potential revenue source could affect the decisions made over the next three to four months. <br />4J School District Board of Directors Chair Craig Smith suggested that depending on the device chosen, <br />the money might not be available until much later in the year. <br />Mr. Clark said he had two small children in grade school in the 4J district and high - quality schools were <br />important to him. He also wanted to see the community lead the state in quality of schools. However, he <br />had concerns about the conversation as it regarded timing. There were many elements to the discussion <br />and the council could be acting quickly to stem a problem that it might not be able to have an impact on <br />until next year. For that reason, he wanted to ensure that anything the City did was smart and well <br />thought -out. <br />Mr. Clark observed that Governor John Kitzhaber said in his "State of the State" speech that the funding <br />crisis gave the State an opportunity to rebuild its house for the 21 century. He believed the council must <br />consider what the State legislature would do in regard to education funding. He recommended that the <br />City take more time rather than move quickly toward a May measure. He questioned whether adding a <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council January 11, 2010 Page 7 <br />Regular Meeting <br />