My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: City Manager Evaluation Follow-Up - and Atts A,B,C
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2011
>
CC Agenda - 04/11/11 Work Session
>
Item B: City Manager Evaluation Follow-Up - and Atts A,B,C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2011 2:10:54 PM
Creation date
4/7/2011 1:56:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/11/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />ECC <br />UGENE ITY OUNCIL <br />AIS <br />GENDA TEM UMMARY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Work Session: City Manager Evaluation Follow-Up <br /> <br /> <br />Meeting Date: April 11, 2011 Agenda Item Number: B <br />Department: Central Services-Human Resources Staff Contact: Denise Smith <br />www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 541-682-5731 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br /> <br />This agenda item is a work session to review the 2011 performance rating system for the City Manager as <br />well as to look at a standard formula for compensation. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />City Manager Jon Ruiz had his annual performance review on July 26, 2010. At that time the council <br />discussed looking at a new performance rating system as well as a new compensation structure for the <br />City Manager. The council directed staff to draft a compensation proposal which includes a new <br />performance rating system and a connection to annual compensation adjustments. Staff returned to the <br />council with a draft on September 27, 2010. <br /> <br />At that time the council liked the overall proposal but requested staff to: <br /> <br /> <br />Make some language adjustments to the ratings based on the council’s review <br /> <br /> <br />Return to the council after the Police Auditor feedback process in the fall and let the council <br />consider potential parallel adjustments to that process. <br /> <br />City Manager information: <br />Attached are the following documents for council review. <br /> <br />1.Attachment A - outlines the proposed three-tier rating system, and their definitions, to be used in <br />future evaluations of the City Manager. This attachment has been updated and reflects the <br />recommendations from the City Council’s review last fall. <br /> <br />2.Attachment B - provides the proposed compensation formula to determine future salary increases for <br />the City Manager based on his performance, while providing a consistent application based on ratings. <br /> <br />3.Attachment C- draft of the language changes for the City Manager’s employment contract with the <br />City Council. <br /> <br />Police Auditor information: <br />The City Police Auditor contract currently specifies a six-step compensation structure, which parallels the <br />compensation structure used by the rest of the City’s positions. This structure was established when the <br />Police Auditor’s position was originally created by the City Council. <br /> <br />The City Police Auditor evaluation process from 2010 used the same ratings language as the City <br />Manager’s process. <br /> \\Cesrv500\cc support\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M110411\S110411B -and Atts A,B,C.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.