My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 18686
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1980s No. 18550-19659
>
Ordinance No. 18686
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2012 11:01:24 AM
Creation date
4/22/2011 12:54:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
7/28/1980
Document_Number
18686
CMO_Effective_Date
7/28/1980
Author
Sandra Stubbs
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
18686 <br />E. The Plan D12Qram <br />Introduction <br />The Plan diagram is a generalized map and graphic expression of the goals, <br />objectives, and recommendations found elsewhere in the Plan. Rather than <br />an accurate representation of actual size and shape, the arrangement of existing <br />and, to an even greater degree, projected land uses illustrated on the diagram <br />is based on the various elements and p r i n c i p l e s embodied in the Plan. L i kewi se, <br />statements in this section that prescribe specific courses of action regarding <br />the community's future should. be regarded as policies. <br />Projections i n d i c a t e a population of approximately 293,700 will reside and <br />work in the metropolitan area by 2000" The allocation of living, working, <br />and recreational areas and supporting public facilities shown on the diagram <br />and public facilities map in this section generally respond to that projection. <br />If a growth rate management system is adopted that effectively slows the growth <br />of population, the fulfillment of the diagram will not be reached until some- <br />time after the turn of the century. When it is acknowledged that the diagram <br />represents a certain number of people rather than a point in time, it becomes <br />clear that acceptance of the diagram does ' not invalidate the, pursuit of a <br />growth rate management system. Should such a system prove feasible and desirable <br />for the community, the process used to allocate land uses on the diagram, fully <br />documented in the Plan Diagram Alternatives Technical Report (January 1979) , can <br />be repeated for a population at any point in time. <br />Finally, the diagram is drawn at a metropolitan scale necessitating supplemental <br />planning on a local level. The diagram and text provide the overall framework <br />within which more detailed planning occurs on that local level. When local <br />plans include densities or land use allocations significant on a metropolitan <br />scale, their adoption requires analysis of metropolitan implications followed by <br />amendments to the Metropolitan Plan when necessary. Standards for identifying <br />factors of metropolitan significance need to -be defined and agreed to by Spring- <br />field, Lane County, and Eugene. <br />In practice, the process of referrals between the three bodies will also deter- <br />mine issues of metropolitan significance on a ease- by- case' <br />Major Influen <br />The Metropolitan Plan diagram reflects the influence of many sources . Parti- <br />cularly noteworthy are the following <br />1. The Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission's statewide <br />Planning Goals, .as published in April, 1977. <br />2. The. Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area 1.990 General Plan, predecessor <br />of this document; particularly the concept of compact urban growth. <br />II -E -1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.