My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 18686
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1980s No. 18550-19659
>
Ordinance No. 18686
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2012 11:01:24 AM
Creation date
4/22/2011 12:54:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
7/28/1980
Document_Number
18686
CMO_Effective_Date
7/28/1980
Author
Sandra Stubbs
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M � <br />9. Large institutional uses, such as universities and hospitals, <br />present complex planning problems for the metropolitan area due to <br />their location, facility expansion plans, and continuing housing and <br />parking problems. <br />10. Due to the i ncrea.se of child persons as a percent of the <br />total population and the level off from a downward trend of <br />fertility rates, overall metropolitan school enrollments are pro- <br />jected to increase both in terms of total number and i n the rate <br />of growth through the rest of this century-. However, projected <br />school enrollment increases will not be evenly distributed among <br />the three metropolitan school districts: The Eugene d.i str i ct w i l l <br />probably continue to decline into the early 1980's before beginning <br />to increase; Springfield, Bethel, and private schools -will likely <br />follow the ov er al metropolitan trend. <br />11. Growth patterns do not always respect school district boundaries. <br />For example, natural cycles of growth and neighborhood maturation <br />result in uneven geographic growth patterns in the metropolitan <br />area, which cause a d i s p a r i t y between the location of some schools <br />and school children. This results in some fringe area schools <br />exceeding capacity while some central city schools are under <br />capacity. <br />12, adjustments to attendance area boundaries, double shifting, addi- <br />tions to exi.sting facilities, use of portable classrooms and busing <br />are being used by metropolitan area school districts to maximize <br />the use of present facilities and delay new school construction. <br />13. Elementary and community schools represent important features td <br />residential neighborhoods and a lack of such facilities can reduce <br />the 1. i v ab i 1 i ty of an area in terms of neighborhood _ needs . <br />14. Residents of central city neighborhoods have identified the presence <br />of elementary and community school facilities as important contri- <br />butors to the stability of their neighborhoods and to the ability <br />of neighborhoods to attract a range of families and- households, <br />including families with school -age children. <br />15.. There are no significant increases anticipated in either , the over- - <br />al <br />all enrollment or work force at the University of '. oregon . New <br />facilities are planned to meet the needs of the various departments <br />and not to create additional capacity, <br />16. Lane Community College plans no new f a c i l i t i e s on the main campus <br />beyond those included i n the school master plan .Increased enroll- <br />ment will be accommodated through expansion of off- progr <br />III -G--3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.