My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 18686
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1980s No. 18550-19659
>
Ordinance No. 18686
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2012 11:01:24 AM
Creation date
4/22/2011 12:54:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
7/28/1980
Document_Number
18686
CMO_Effective_Date
7/28/1980
Author
Sandra Stubbs
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I . Historic Preservation Element <br />The metropolitan area has experienced,, and it appears w i l l continue to exper- <br />ience, growth and change. On the other hand, p u b l i c interest and commi tme'nt <br />to historic preservation has been increasing, at least partly due to recogn - <br />tion that historic structures, sites, and areas which provide a tangible <br />physical connection with the past are a nonrenewable resource. This link with <br />previous times provides a sense of permanence, continuity, and perspective to <br />our lives as well as a context within which change occurs. Historic structures <br />can enrich our lives by offering architectural diversity to the visual environ- <br />ment and provide tangible links to the future. <br />Findings <br />1. Programs and publications that identify sites, structures, objects, <br />and c u l t u r a l areas and activities of historic significance serve as <br />- a visual and educational experience for the public, <br />2. Structures and sites of historic significance contribute to an <br />area's ability to attract tourism. <br />3. The metropolitan area has an important heritage of historic sites, <br />structures, and objects worthy of preservation, <br />4. When positive measures are not taken, visible evidence of ties to <br />the past and reminders of our heritage disappear, <br />50. To varying degrees, Springfield, Lane County, and Eugene are cur- <br />rently designing and implementing programs of historic preservation <br />and awareness. <br />6. While several archaeological' <br />rchaeol og i c al ' sites are located i n the metropolitan <br />area, the value and significance of only one has been determined, <br />There remain many sections of the metropolitan area in which no <br />surveying has been done to locate archaeological sites. <br />7. Historic preservation programs generally allow continued and changing <br />occupancy of historic structures and sites. <br />8. Beginning with the Antiquities Act of 1906 and through the present <br />time, both the federal and Oregon state governments have expressed <br />an interest in and enacted l aws' providing for the protection and <br />preservation of sites, structures, objects, and areas of historic <br />significance. <br />9, Depending on the nature and condition of an individual structure, <br />rehabilitation rather than replacement may be less costly per <br />square foot, more labor intensive, and less energy consuming, <br />thereby resulting in net savings. <br />III-I-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.