Ordinance No. 20224 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Adopted Plan Policies 9.9500 Adopted, Policies The adopted plan policies set forth in the sections beginning at EC 9.9500 shall be used when applicable for purposes of evaluating applicable adopted plan policies pertaining to subdivisions, partitions, and site review. 9,9510 Bethel- Danebo Refinement Plan Policies (1) Bethel- Danebo Refinement Plan (1952). (a) Land use Bethel-Triangle Nei boyhood. Highest priority shall be given to preserving housing in the Bethel Triangle area. It shall be recognized that it is an irreplaceable resource. Support for its continued viability shall be provided along the following guidelines: 1. Efforts should be made to upgrade the public facilities and services (sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, street lighting) in the area. Particular attention should be given to street conditions and the need for improving Trainsong Park. 2. Efforts to upgrade public facilities and services should consider alternatives to full assessments where hardships can be established. (Policy 1) (b) Urban Services and the Urban Growth Bound Parks. 1. Landscape buffer shall be provided in conjunction with new public improvements, such as highways, freeways, power substations, etc. (Policy 6) 2. Landscape buffer should be provided along existing highways and freeways. (Policy 7) (c) Transportation, Streets 1. In newly developing portions of Bethel- Danebo, street network design should ensure that through traffic movements are adequately served by higher level streets (i.e., arterials and collectors) and that local traffic alone is encouraged to use the local streets, thereby enhancing the local character of the streets in residential areas. (Policy 1) 2. when high traffic generators are located on higher level streets, particularly in the case of location on arterials, access should be controlled wherever possible and joint access by several uses encouraged. (Policy 2) 3. On principal and minor arterials and collectors, the predominant function of carrying through traffic should prevail and removal of on- street parking privileges should occur where the traffic- moving function requires it and right -of -way is inadequate to accommodate both functions. (Policy 3) Ordinance - 390