Ordinance No. 20475 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

All other key urban services are currently available to the subject property, or can be extended in an orderly and efficient manner to the property as needed to serve development. Based on the findings above, key urban facilities and services are currently available, or can be extended in an orderly manner to the subject property as required, consistent with this criterion. (4) The proposed zone change is consistent with the applicable siting requirements set out for the specific zone in: (u) An uncodified ordinance establishing a site specific 5 -H Historic Special Area Zone, a copy of which is maintained at the city's planning and development department. The proposed zone change is to establish a site specific S -H Historic Special Area Zone. Criteria to establish this zone begin at EC 9.3020 and are addressed above. The uncodified ordinance, if adopted, will be maintained at the City's planning and development department consistent with this criterion. (5) in cases where the NR zone is applied based on EC 9.2510(3), the property owner shall enter into a contractual arrangement with the city to ensure the area is maintained as a natural resource area for a minimum of 50 years. The NR zone is not requested or applicable in this instance. Therefore, the above criterion is inapplicable. Transportation Planning Rule: The Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) (OAR 660- 012 - 0060(1 )} requires compliance if a change to a functional plan, acknowledged comprehensive plan, or land uses regulation would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility. The Hearings Official in the zone change decision for Hahn, et al (City file Z 08 -9) concluded that City of Eugene's zoning map changes are not categorically excluded from the Transportation Planning Rule (Oregon Administrative Rule OAR 660 -012- 0060). The applicant's State Transportation Planning Rule (Goal 12) analysis indicates that no significant impact to the transportation system will occur as a result of the proposed zone change from R -2 to S -H. As noted in the analysis, under the existing zoning of the 0.44 acre property, a reasonable assumption based on allowed uses would be multi- family development with a maximum of 12 dwelling units, which translates into a potential eight (8) trips during the PM peak hour (ITE land Use Code 220; 0.55 trips per dwelling). The worst -case development scenarios (the most intense traffic generators) of uses to be permitted by the proposed S -H ordinance are as follows: Use ITE Land Use Code Estimated PM Peak Professional Office 710 3 trips Restaurant 1 16 trips Findings — Brunner Schmitz House (Z 10 -12) Page 7