My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 2747 Westside Plan
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
pre 1996 Resolutions
>
Resolution No. 2747 Westside Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2012 10:29:50 AM
Creation date
7/19/2011 3:35:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
9/12/1977
Document_Number
2747
CMO_Effective_Date
9/12/1977
Author
Sandra Stubbs
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
street trees the close-in location, the varied population, and the atmosphere <br />created by -all of these characteristics taken together. The perceived threats <br />to this way of life include large-scale conversion or redevelopment of many <br />older structures. <br />These implementation methods address the density and' character of development, <br />-w P hich are- of major concern. to the Westsi de Neighborhood, Establishing the R -2 <br />des i 9 nation throughout most of the residential portion of the neighborhood would <br />allow an overall density of 16 units per net acre, compared with the existing <br />overall density . of 11.3 units per net acre. This would allow for more devel - <br />P . <br />o ment of higher density uses , but would maintain the medium•- density character <br />9 <br />of the nei hborhood. Restricting the permitted size of multiple-family devel- <br />P <br />o ments to four units per structure, and using site review procedures for <br />three -- or four -unit developments, would aid in controlling the siting, scale, <br />and bulk of new development and its compatibility with the rest of the area O <br />Such a requirement might also serve to discourage speculative purchases and <br />lessen the inclination of investors to amass large pieces of property for the. <br />purposes of large-scale redevelopment. <br />Housin g types which traditionally have not been built might be encouraged <br />through the use of the size limitation on multi-family structures. Row houses <br />(single-family attached) or townhouses could be encourag ed as an alternative to <br />the traditional, barge apartment bui 1 di ng construction .$ and would fit in better <br />with the scale, style, and density-of the neighborhood. <br />Existing small neighborhood grocery stores should not be discouraged in resi - <br />denti al areas, but should be allowed conditionally. The allowable amount of <br />floor space used for this purpose should be restricted to ensure that it serves <br />primarily walk-in customers and does not generate traffic detrimental to the <br />surrounding residential area. _ <br />In <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.