Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Ortiz supported the original motion. She was unhappy the council had yet to hear a <br />presentation on gang activity. She said the Police Commission heard a presentation on the topic and <br />viewed a video filmed in her neighborhood of a gang member "jump in." As the area's councilor she was <br />unhappy not to have heard about such activity occurring in her neighborhood. She wanted to ensure the <br />department had money to implement whatever solution might be needed. <br />Councilor Farr determined from City Manager Ruiz that if the motion did not pass, the City would fund <br />the expenditure in the manner approved by the Budget Committee. <br />Councilor Zelenka did not support the motion because Chief Kerns had not requested funding for gang <br />prevention in the budget process and he was unclear as to what was involved in such an initiative. He <br />wanted to know more before the council funded it. <br />Councilor Zelenka determined that Councilor Taylor did not object to a friendly amendment to the motion <br />to amend that read "As soon as possible, the council will hold a work session on a gang prevention <br />initiative." <br />Roll call vote: The amendment to the motion failed, 5:3; councilors Taylor, Zelenka, and <br />Brown voting yes. <br />Roll call vote: The motion passed, 6:2; councilors Zelenka and Brown voting no. <br />Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Poling, moved to direct the City Manager to <br />amend the FYI 2 City of Eugene budget to restore the engine company positions at Fire <br />Station #2 by using $317,000 of unanticipated EWEB CILT moneys and to schedule, <br />within six months, a work session on solving the ambulance transportation problem and <br />to start with the Joint Elected Officials- developed solutions and other proposed staff <br />solutions for that work session. <br />Councilor Clark emphasized the seriousness of the ambulance transportation funding problem and the <br />importance of solving it. He thought the department's proposal was a good start but the loss of the <br />company was too much for him to accept. He wanted to retain the company and find a solution to the <br />ambulance transportation problem this year. <br />Mayor Piercy appreciated the intention of the motion but was concerned that it would not solve the long- <br />term financial issue that existed. <br />Councilor Poling supported the motion because it made it clear the funding was a "band -aid" fix. He <br />supported the use of one -time moneys in this case. He thanked Councilor Clark for his willingness to <br />work with staff and other councilors toward the common good on this and the previous issue. He thought <br />his solution was a good one. <br />Councilor Pryor expressed appreciation to the City Manager for his continual reminders that the council <br />should not use one -time money for ongoing expenses. He agreed that the motion represented a one -time <br />fix that required a future structural discussion. With the expectation of a future work session on the issue, <br />he supported the motion as a way to buy the community more time. Councilor Pryor supported the City <br />Manager in his continued endeavors to find a long -term structural solution to the problem of ambulance <br />transportation funding. <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council June 27, 2011 Page 10 <br />Regular Meeting <br />