Laserfiche WebLink
Policy Title: Gifts, Sponsorships, Charitable Contributions and <br />Memberships <br />Purpose: To present the policy for employees when con <br />sponsorships, charitable contributions, and memberships <br />work related gifts, <br />Scope: All City of Eugene employees. <br />Policy Statement: From time to time, offers ( <br />benefits are made available to City staff. The, <br />public, a business or a department of the City. <br />employees from using their positions.to obtain <br />Order 44- 91 -07, Establishing Rules and PrOCs <br />ORS 244.025 and 244.040). 116 <br />iti vp j;�scounts�, r or otrr <br />Jfferstrnay come from`a-member of the <br />generally S#a e;,law pro hibits public <br />anci6l�benefits`(see City Administrative <br />res Regarding Gifts to Employees and <br />ORS 244.025 specifically profiibits apublicofficial (which includes all City employees as <br />well as their close relatives and meat "I "of their households) from soliciting or <br />receiving gifts with a value in excess o in any calendar year from any single source <br />that could reasonably be known to have Native or administrative interest. A <br />"legislative or ad inistrative interest' is defi as "an economic interest, distinct from <br />that of the gener I'' ;ki�tic, in any matter subject to the decision or vote of the public <br />official acting in th i I� � capacity as a public official." For example, the $50- <br />per -year gift limit w'i coij l��gifts to any city employee who has decision - <br />making authority for pV�rri sing, d §; osing of vendors or contractors, inspection <br />functions, or regulatoryenforcement, if the gifts come from any single source with an <br />economic interest in the'employee's decisions. <br />Sponsorships and Donations to City Programs <br />An important part of the relationship that the City organization has with the public is <br />based on both the reality and perception of fairness and honesty. All staff has the <br />responsibility to conduct themselves in a manner that does not detract from the public <br />trust. Staff should be aware that there is a greater "perception" problem with <br />procurement and regulatory staff such as building inspectors, police officers or <br />purchasing agents. While State law would allow the acceptance of gifts that did not <br />exceed $50, public perception in those cases where the receiver of the gift had a <br />procurement or regulatory relationship with the giver would be problematic. These <br />employees must use extra caution not to be perceived as receiving benefits from those <br />that they regulate. <br />City of Eugene <br />APM No: <br />4.6 <br />Administrative Policy Manual <br />Date Updated: <br />August 1, 2011 <br />Policy Title: Gifts, Sponsorships, Charitable Contributions and <br />Memberships <br />Purpose: To present the policy for employees when con <br />sponsorships, charitable contributions, and memberships <br />work related gifts, <br />Scope: All City of Eugene employees. <br />Policy Statement: From time to time, offers ( <br />benefits are made available to City staff. The, <br />public, a business or a department of the City. <br />employees from using their positions.to obtain <br />Order 44- 91 -07, Establishing Rules and PrOCs <br />ORS 244.025 and 244.040). 116 <br />iti vp j;�scounts�, r or otrr <br />Jfferstrnay come from`a-member of the <br />generally S#a e;,law pro hibits public <br />anci6l�benefits`(see City Administrative <br />res Regarding Gifts to Employees and <br />ORS 244.025 specifically profiibits apublicofficial (which includes all City employees as <br />well as their close relatives and meat "I "of their households) from soliciting or <br />receiving gifts with a value in excess o in any calendar year from any single source <br />that could reasonably be known to have Native or administrative interest. A <br />"legislative or ad inistrative interest' is defi as "an economic interest, distinct from <br />that of the gener I'' ;ki�tic, in any matter subject to the decision or vote of the public <br />official acting in th i I� � capacity as a public official." For example, the $50- <br />per -year gift limit w'i coij l��gifts to any city employee who has decision - <br />making authority for pV�rri sing, d §; osing of vendors or contractors, inspection <br />functions, or regulatoryenforcement, if the gifts come from any single source with an <br />economic interest in the'employee's decisions. <br />Sponsorships and Donations to City Programs <br />An important part of the relationship that the City organization has with the public is <br />based on both the reality and perception of fairness and honesty. All staff has the <br />responsibility to conduct themselves in a manner that does not detract from the public <br />trust. Staff should be aware that there is a greater "perception" problem with <br />procurement and regulatory staff such as building inspectors, police officers or <br />purchasing agents. While State law would allow the acceptance of gifts that did not <br />exceed $50, public perception in those cases where the receiver of the gift had a <br />procurement or regulatory relationship with the giver would be problematic. These <br />employees must use extra caution not to be perceived as receiving benefits from those <br />that they regulate. <br />