Laserfiche WebLink
Neighborhood Livability Working Group <br />Neighborhood-based Planning <br />Problem Description <br />While the West University neighborhood has already transitioned to one of low owner occupancy and high <br />density, this pattern has been spreading to the edges of adjacent neighborhoods in recent years. This situation has <br />created the need for neighborhood-level planning that is responsive to the unique challenges now facing other <br />campus area neighborhoods. The pattern and design of development in this area contributes to negative impacts <br />and requires consideration of strategies related to planning and land use to address livability. <br /> <br />Multi-family developments are regulated by the number of units they include, which does not give a true sense of <br />the number of individuals that will be housed together. Current projects in the vicinity of the University of Oregon <br />include fewer studio or one bedroom units in favor of a more profitable mix of three, four, five and even six <br />bedroom apartments. In addition, there can be distinct differences in impacts associated with traditional multi- <br />family versus high occupancy multi- <br />code does not recognize these differences and treats all multi-family housing alike. <br /> <br />Another issue of concern is that the current land use code provides exemptions for open space requirements for <br />projects that meet a target percentage of allowable density. This serves to remove an important amenity for high <br />density projects that congregate large groups of people with no places to gather and socialize. This results in <br />groups of young adults spilling out into sidewalks and streets with noise and other behaviors impacting neighbors. <br />This emphasis on dense living also puts pressure on converting open space to driveways and parking reducing this <br />amenity even further. <br /> <br />An additional design issue involves screening garbage receptacles and recycling containers and the poorly lit <br />spaces around and between buildings. The combination of hidden spaces and low light provides areas where <br />criminal behavior can take place out of sight. <br /> <br />Strategy Description <br />The actions listed below have been identified by neighborhood representatives as priority planning and land use <br />strategies to improve impacts to livability. A number of them have also been identified in past or ongoing <br />planning processes (identified in parenthesis) as important to addressing development impacts to livability. <br />Complete area planning for the university-area neighborhoods that addresses the interface between the <br /> <br />university, high density housing and surrounding neighborhoods. (Envision Eugene) <br />Revise code to address the deficiency of open space in multi-family developments. (Infill Compatibility <br /> <br />Standards) <br />Change the way density for multi-family housing is calculated so that it more actually reflects the number <br /> <br />of residents. (Infill Compatibility Standards) <br />Strengthen standards regulating parking in set-backs and open space. (Infill Compatibility Standards) <br /> <br />Provide different definitions for traditional multi-family and high occupancy unrelated adult housing that <br /> <br />recognize the distinct difference of housing that caters primarily to young adult (typically university <br />student) renters. Providing this distinction in the code could allow for development of standards that <br />addresses the unique impacts created by high occupancy housing. <br />Review existing codes related to lighting and fencing and identify areas where changes could improve <br /> <br />security and public safety. <br /> <br />Related Goals/Policies <br />Metro Plan Policy A.13: <br /> <br />Increase overall residential density in the metropolitan area by creating more opportunities for effectively <br />designed in-fill, redevelopment, and mixed use while considering impacts of increased residential density <br />on historic, existing and future neighborhoods. <br />Metro Plan Policy A.23: <br /> <br /> <br />39 <br />Page <br />