Ordinance No. 20441 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

single- family dwelling units would be in excess of 300 units. Based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 300 residential units would generate an estimated 300 PM peak trips, far exceeding the number of PM peak trips that would trigger the City's TIA Review code provisions. Because no development that will generate more than 100. PM peak trips will be able to occur on the subject property without the a demonstration of compliance with the City's TIA Review requirements, postponing the TPR/Goal 12 analysis so that it can occur concurrently with the TIA Review analysis is reasonable and practicable. As means of ensuring that any development that occurs on the subject property is consistent with Goal 12, the following condition of approval will be imposed on the Metro Plan amendment: • Prior to the approval of any land division or site review application for the Property • referenced in Section 1 of this Ordinance, in addition to any applicable requirements of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Review in the Eugene City Code, the applicant shall submit to the City a traffic impact analysis that demonstrates consistency with the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) at OAR 660 -12 -0060. At•the applicant's choice, this TPR analysis may be submitted and processed simultaneously with the TIA Review. Additionally, as a means of ensuring that DLCD and ODOT receive notice of the proposed development, the following condition of approval will be imposed on the Metro Plan amendment: Upon receipt of any land division or site review application for the Property referenced in Section 1 of this Ordinance the City shall provide notice to DLCD in the same manner as the City provides notice for a post - acknowledged plan _ amendment. Based on the above -two conditions of approval, the proposal is consistent with Statewide Planning • Goal 12. • Goal 13 - Energy Conservation: To conserve energy. Statewide Planning Goal 13 calls for land uses to be managed and controlled "so as to maximize the conservation of all forms of energy, based upon sound economic principles." Goal 13 is directed at the development of local energy policies and implementing provisions and does not state requirements with respect to other types of land use decisions. It is not clear that the goal has any • bearing on a site-specific decision such as the one at issue. There is no implementing rule that clarifies the requirements of Goal 13. To the extent that Goal 13 could be applied to the proposed change in designation, the designation is consistent with Goal 13. The proposed site is located so that a future development can make efficient use of energy with direct and efficient access. The proposal is consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 13. • Goal 14 - Urbanization: To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use. The amendments do not effect the transition from rural to urban land use, as the subject property is within the Eugene - Springfield Urban Growth Boundary limits. Therefore, Statewide Planning Goal • Findings of Consistency . Page 6