My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B - Econ.Dev.Comm. Recomm.
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-08/09/04WS
>
Item B - Econ.Dev.Comm. Recomm.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:11:18 PM
Creation date
8/9/2004 10:58:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
8/9/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the code and other City policies. There should be some effort to help permit <br /> applicants find ways to fix their development to meet the spirit of City standards. <br /> <br /> The Economic Development Committee identified one specific action related <br /> to this problem: the City could create a staff position that would act as a business <br /> facilitator, or ombudsman. An ombudsman would enhance the experience and <br /> image of doing business in Eugene. <br /> <br /> An ombudsman's day-to-day role would be to help coordinate the multi- <br /> agency aspect of development. The permitting process requires that applicants <br /> work with different departments that have different goals. The ombudsman would <br /> assist an applicant to navigate through the process, and help negotiate solutions to <br /> permitting obstacles. <br /> <br /> The ombudsman would work with all the different departments and divisions <br /> that regulate the development of new and existing sites. The ombudsman would <br /> have the perspective of both an applicant and a City staffer. Because this person <br /> will have a different vantage point from other staff, he or she would have insight <br /> into how to develop methods and policies to streamline the permitting process. It <br /> is recommended that the job description also include time devoted to code <br /> revision recommendations or other systemic changes. <br /> <br /> In the long-term, the expenditure on an ombudsman will be cost effective. The <br /> Planning Division generates a large portion of its own budget through permitting <br /> fees. If an applicant decides to not pursue a development because the process is <br /> too cumbersome, that revenue will never be generated. A staff member who <br /> works to keeps these applicants in the system will help the Division continue to <br /> raise permitting revenues. <br /> <br /> RECOMMENDATION . <br /> <br /> The City Council and Budget Committee should fund a facilitator to assist <br /> businesses with expansion, coordinate multi-agency review of development <br /> permits, and assist in developing methods and policies to help streamline <br /> permitting process. <br /> <br /> 4. ENTERPRISE ZONE <br /> <br /> THE PROBLEM <br /> <br /> The City of Eugene has few public financial incentives for new or growing <br /> businesses. There is a perception that Eugene's lack of an Enterprise Zone puts us <br /> at a competitive disadvantage with other jurisdictions that do have an Enterprise <br /> Zone. The problem with the lack of incentives is that neighboring communities do <br /> have them. Eugene competes with other communities in Oregon for jobs. <br /> <br /> SOLUTIONS <br /> Governments can offer firms financial incentives to encourage growth. <br /> Financial incentives come in many forms, but all reduce the cost of doing <br /> <br />Mayor's Committee on Economic Development July 2004 Recommendations Page 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.