My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B - Econ.Dev.Comm. Recomm.
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-08/09/04WS
>
Item B - Econ.Dev.Comm. Recomm.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:11:18 PM
Creation date
8/9/2004 10:58:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
8/9/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECOMMENDATIONS IN SUPPORT OF EXISTING <br /> TOOLS <br /> The Committee found that the City of Eugene has policies in place that <br /> positively impact economic development. Rather than ignore the existing policies, <br /> the Committee decided to acknowledge that these tools matter, and to explicitly <br /> express support for the City's activities. <br /> <br /> 1. INFRASTRUCTURE <br /> An important role of government is to increase economic capacity by <br /> improving the quality and efficiency Of infrastructure such as roads, bridges, <br /> water and sewer systems, airport and cargo facilities, energy systems, and <br /> telecommunications. <br /> <br /> The Committee agreed that infrastructure is one of the most important things <br /> that a local government provides, and it is important to acknowledge that the City <br /> should continue to support its infrastructure systems. <br /> <br /> 2. URBAN RENEWAL <br /> The Committee discussed the impor, tance of Urban Renewal as an active <br /> redevelopment strategy. The Committee also generally discussed the potential <br /> uses of urban renewal to encourage redevelopment beyond the existing district. <br /> <br /> Urban Renewal Districts are a powerful tool for economic development. A <br /> subcommittee was formed to explore how this tool has been and could be used in <br /> Eugene, looking at boundaries, governance, models, and reinvestment strategies. <br /> Although the subcommittee produced no recommendations, the members agreed <br /> that these issues warrant further study. <br /> <br /> CONCLUDING COMMENTS <br /> The Committee was asked by the City Council to identify tools that would <br /> further economic development in Eugene. It was asked to do that in a relatively <br /> short amount of time, and was required to achieve at least 75% agreement on its <br /> recommendations. <br /> <br /> The recommendations above are a small subset of the potential economic <br /> development tools available to the City of Eugene. These recommendations cover <br /> the tools that the Committee had time to debate and agree on. There are additional <br /> options and issues associated with economic development that the City could <br /> address. It is likely that with more time and discussion the Committee could have <br /> come to agreement on additional recommendations. <br /> <br /> The Committee believes these recommendations are a good starting point. <br /> They are ones where this diverse Committee, after substantial debate and <br /> compromise, could find some agreement. If the Council sees fit to adopt these <br /> recommendations, and if they prove to be as successful as the Committee hopes, <br /> <br />Mayor's Committee on Economic Development July 2004 Recommendations Page 13 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.