My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B - Econ.Dev.Comm. Recomm.
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-08/09/04WS
>
Item B - Econ.Dev.Comm. Recomm.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:11:18 PM
Creation date
8/9/2004 10:58:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
8/9/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Bowers said a plan that had a project focus gave the City flexibility to act when <br /> opportunities arose. The problem was never the lack of a plan, but a lack of implementation. <br /> <br />Mr. Bowers recommended that the City: <br /> <br /> · Be clear about what kind of business was acceptable to create certainty <br /> · Focus on business retention/new business creation--business attraction is a "crap <br /> shoot" <br /> · Focus incentives on family wage jobs; minimum wage jobs will come on their <br /> own <br /> · Create a business ombudsman to help businesses work through the regulations <br /> · Place long-term effort and support toward economic development--the political <br /> support for economic development tends to be countercyclical but real flexibility <br /> is available when times are good, and'.that was when the framework to weather <br /> the next recession can be established : <br /> · Isolate economic development from politics <br /> · Should be flexible to be opportunistic; Eugene tended to want to "pin things <br /> down" and that was not an affective approach <br /> · Not confuse economic development with downtown development; downtown <br /> development was necessary, but not sufficient <br /> · Scale incentives to match the public' benefit <br /> · Establish public/private partnerships <br /> · React quickly <br /> · Dedicate resources to economic development, specifically through the <br /> establishment of new urban renewal districts--such districts are a flawed tool, but <br /> one of the few Oregon allows <br /> Consider bonding against the urban renewal districts for funding <br /> · Establish a new enterprise zone--it would be a significant symbolic gesture <br /> · Commit some General Fund dollars to economic development <br /> · Reestablish the Business Assistance Team <br /> · Participate in Metro Partnership efforts <br /> · Establish an Urban Renewal Agency Authority. separate from the City Council or <br /> create an urban renewal advisory comm/~tee <br /> · Reestablish the Downtown Commission <br /> · Give staff the authority to act--Eugene, has excellent staff <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Pierce, Mr. Bowersindicated that Eugene could not <br />discriminate in terms of nature of the businesses that located in an enterprise zone. Ms. Pierce <br />suggested the creation of such a zone could violate some other tenants the committee discussed, <br />such as the importance of family wage jobs. Mr. Bowers agreed. He said that in the past, the <br />City Council had considered, although it did not approve, a fairly sophisticated set of benefits <br />tied to the public good. Ms. Pierce asked if the zone must be contiguous. Mr. Bowers said yes. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Mayor's Committee on Economic Development April 20, 2004 Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.