My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: HRC - Recommendations from HR Listening Project
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2011
>
CC Agenda - 10/24/11 Work Session
>
Item B: HRC - Recommendations from HR Listening Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2011 10:22:30 AM
Creation date
10/20/2011 4:15:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/24/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.SR <br />URVEY ESULTS <br />TheinformationpresentedinthissectionreflectstheresultsoftheHumanRightsSurvey.The <br />surveywasadministeredinpaperformatafewcommunityevents;itwasalsoavailableonline <br />throughalinkofftheHumanRightsKĨĨŝĐĞ͛Ɛhomepage.Mostofthesurveysthatanalyzedwere <br />onlinesurveys.ThesurveywasavailableinbothEnglishandSpanish. <br />NotallwhotookthesurveyagreewiththegoalsandpurposeoftheEHRCandHRC.These <br />individualsmadetheirstatementsknowninspaceswhereopenendedquestionsallowedthe <br />surveyrespondenttowritearesponsetoaquestion(i.e.definingequitableandinclusive, <br />identifyingissuesofpriority,andquestionsthatcontainedan͞ŽƚŚĞƌ͟category).Some <br />individualswhotookthesurveyexpressedfeelingsrootedinnonequitableorinclusiveness <br />towardtheLGBTQIcommunity,nonChristianreligiousgroups,andLatinoCommunityand <br />statedthefollowing: <br />͞ƵŐĞŶĞHumanRightsCommissionshouldnotusecitydollarstoadvocateforwhatit <br />believesarehumanrightsissues,butoftenwithabiasinviewsregardingmoralŝƐƐƵĞƐ͖͟ <br />͞dŚĞƌĞistoomuchemphasisinservingthe,ŝƐƉĂŶŝĐƐ͖͟and <br />͞KƵƌmoneyshouldnotgototheillegalimmigrants.Ourtaxmoney!NotƚŚĞŝƌƐ͊͟ <br /> <br />Inclusive & Equitable Services <br />YƵĞƐƚŝŽŶWƌĞĨĂĐĞͬdžƉůĂŶĂƚŝŽŶ͗dŚĞŝƚLJŽĨƵŐĞŶĞǁŽƵůĚůŝŬĞƚŽĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌŽƵƌƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐƚŽŝŶƐƵƌĞ <br />ƚŚĞLJĂƌĞŝŶĐůƵƐŝǀĞĂŶĚĞƋƵŝƚĂďůĞ͘,ĞůƉƵƐĚĞĨŝŶĞƚŚĞƐĞĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐŝŶƌĞůĂƚŝŽŶƐŚŝƉƚŽŝƚLJŽĨƵŐĞŶĞ <br />ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ;ŝ͘Ğ͘ĐŽƵƌƚƐ͕ƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͕ƉŽůŝĐĞ͕ƉĂƌŬƐ͕ŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ͕ƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ͕ůŝďƌĂƌLJ͕ĞƚĐ͘Ϳ <br />YƵĞƐƚŝŽŶϭ͘dŽŵĞ͕ŝŶĐůƵƐŝǀĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂƌĞ͙;ǁƌŝƚĞŝŶƌĞƐƉŽŶƐĞŚĞƌĞͿ <br />YƵĞƐƚŝŽŶϮ͘dŽŵĞ͕ĞƋƵŝƚĂďůĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂƌĞ͙;ǁƌŝƚĞŝŶƌĞƐƉŽŶƐĞŚĞƌĞͿ <br />Duetotheambiguitycreatedbytheactualfillintheblankquestion,surveyrespondents <br />producedmanytypesofanswersduetotheirinterpretationsofwhatthequestionswere <br />actuallyaskingofthem.Peopleprimarilyinterpretedbothquestionsintwodifferentways, <br />thoughmanyalsoblanklystatedthattheycouldnotanswerbecausethequestionsdidnot <br />makesensetothem.Thefirstwaythatfolkstendedtoanswerbothquestionswasbyproviding <br />theirowndefinitionof͚ŝŶĐůƵƐŝǀĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ͛and͚ĞƋƵŝƚĂďůĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ͛͘Forexample,someone <br />respondedthatinclusiveservicesare͞ĞƋƵĂůandconfidentialservicesforĂůů͘͟Thesecondway <br />thatfolkstendedtoanswerthequestionwasbysimplylistingcityservicesordepartments. <br />Presumably,thefolksthatansweredinthiswayeitherdidsotoindicatethatsuch <br />services/departmentseitherare,orshouldbe,inclusiveand/orequitable.Themajorityof <br />thosewhocommentedinthe͞ŽƚŚĞƌ͟categoryhadresponsesthateitherwereunusable <br />becausemadenosenseorwasanisolatedstatementthatdoesnotfitintothecategoriesofthe <br />majorthemesidentified.Inthecategoriesdevelopedfor͞ŝŶĐůƵƐŝǀĞ͟definition,examplesofa <br />responsethatwasunusablebecausemadenosenseinclude:͞ŽŬ͟and͞ŽƉĞŶ͘͟Examplesof <br />responsesthatmadesensebutwereisolatedstatementsinclude:͞ĨƌĞĞforĞǀĞƌLJŽŶĞ͟and <br />͞ŶŽŶĞĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞ͘͟Inthecategoriesdevelopedfor͞ĞƋƵŝƚĂďůĞ͟definition,examplesofa <br />responsethatwasunusablebecausemadenosenseinclude:͞ŽŬ͟and͞ŵŽŶĞLJand <br />HRC Priorities <br />July 2011 Page | 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.