Laserfiche WebLink
and interested members of the community. To date, there have been only three meetings with no clear <br />direction for the future. There seems to be concern with leadership on this project as well as a lagging <br />progression in defining the mandate of the office and moving forward with its operation. There also <br />remain unanswered questions regarding the resignation of the former Director of the Office of Human <br />Relations who was asked to step down and has yet to be replaced. Members of the community, the <br />Creation Committee and the Human Rights Commission have expressed concern in the media regarding <br />the direction of this project. <br />At this point there are more questions regarding the future of this office than there are answers; <br />however, this office does represent a significant investment of the City of Portland in equity and human <br />rights in that community. Although there have been concerns with the rate of progress, the City has <br />been intentional in including diverse voices in designing the work of the new office. It remains to be <br />seen what will come of the Office of Equity, but this project warrants further observation in the future. <br /> <br />Findings <br />Commission Structures: The commissions included in this study range from 7 to 15 members but are <br />weighted towards smaller group size. Of the two larger commissions in Alexandria and Tacoma, the <br />former includes five representatives from other boards and commissions and only nine “at large” <br />commissioners. Most staff was in agreement that the smaller sizes of their commissions facilitate strong <br />and manageable working arrangements as well the cultivation of relationships amongst the <br />Commissioners. <br />Of the five Commissions studied, only Fort Collins maintains codified, standing committees. The work of <br />this Commission is focused primarily on community outreach and education and the committees <br />organize regular events throughout the year. The remaining Commissions allow for ad hoc committees <br />or work groups that operate within a specific time frame and with clearly outlined goals. It should be <br />noted that several staff mentioned that the small size of the Commission encouraged the entire group <br />to take on projects together. <br />None of the Commissions studied require specific qualifications to serve although cities vary in their <br />outreach and recruitment efforts. Nearly all of the Commission By-Laws call for a body that represents <br />the make-up of the community but several staff mentioned that goal is often not met. <br />Commission Work Agendas: The efforts of each of the Commissions studied vary somewhat ranging <br />from primarily public outreach and education to being research, policy, and legislation driven. Those <br />Commissions that weigh towards the former emphasize regular public events, interactive learning <br />opportunities and community engagement. Use of local media is especially important in both <br />recognizing local leaders as well as bringing attention to emerging issues in the communities. Those <br />Commissions with the strongest working relationship with City Council seem to be most involved in <br />policy review and recommendations. Several of the Commissions are granted authorities in <br />3 | Page <br /> <br /> <br />