Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Both the City and the Duncan & Brown appraisals discounted the areas of the proposed utility easements by <br />25%. It was proposed to reserve a 15’ easement on each side of the proposed vacation for a gas line (east side) <br />and a waterline (west side). The D&B appraisal further discounted the remaining area between the 2 easements <br />by 25% as they believed it would be similarly restricted because of the resulting narrow shape limiting how it <br />could be developed. As it appears based on proposed development the present highest and best use will <br />continue to be as parking and a driveway in which case the narrow shape would limit such use. And to further <br />mitigate the perceived damage to the area between the 2 easements it is believed reasonable to conclude the <br />gas line can be moved into the westerly easement and run parallel to the waterline. It was explained to be a <br />small gas pipe. EWEB explained it was their understanding there would need to be a 3 foot separation between <br />the gas and waterline. As such, it might be reasonable to increase the 15 foot utility easement by the extra 3 <br />feet from the 15’ proposed easement to 18’. This would assume a horizontal separation and provide the same <br />distance on the outside of both of the pipes in the after condition. If vertical separation were used it could <br />minimize the additional easement area. But for this analysis, we are assuming adding the 3 feet horizontal <br />separation. This results in the following vacation assessments: <br /> <br />Easterly half. 29,364 square feet of the right of way at the D & B market absorption adjusted rate of $37.70 per <br />sq ft yielding $1,107,022 <br /> <br />Westerly half. 16,148 sq ft (22’ x 734’) unencumbered at the D & B market absorption adjusted rate of $28.75 <br />per sq ft yielding $464,255 <br /> <br />The 18’ x 734’ (13,212 sq ft) to be encumbered by a utility easement for the water and gas lines at $21.56 (75% <br />of $28.75) per sq ft yielding $284,850 <br /> <br />Total estimated assessment recognizing the D & B market absorption rates and related discounting along with <br />combining the utility easements. $1,856,000 (rounded from $1,856,127)** <br /> <br />The City’s original estimate of assessment of special benefit was $2,136,000 based on $40 per sq ft with 25% <br />adjustment for easements. <br /> <br />D & B’s revised estimate dated 9/16/10 after deleting an emergency vehicle access and adjusting to 2 – 15’ <br />easements yielded $1,590,000. <br /> <br />As a point of reference, the mean of the 2 values would be $1,863,000. <br /> <br />** The recommended final proposed assessment of $1,856,000 was concluded as a mutually acceptable <br />administrative settlement by city and university staff and is supported on the findings of both appraiser’s <br />reports. The assessment further assumed using one 18’ utility easement as opposed to two 15’ easements. <br /> <br />