Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT C <br /> RESOLUTION NO. <br /> <br /> A RESOLUTION DENYING A LOW-INCOME RENTAL <br /> HOUSING PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPERTY <br /> LOCATED AT MARCHE CHASE DRIVE AND KINSROW <br /> AVENUE, EUGENE, OREGON (TAX LOT 17-03-28-40-1406). <br /> (PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS, INC.). <br /> <br /> The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that: <br /> <br /> A. Public Private Partnerships, Inc. (4800 SW Macadam, Suite 309, Portland, Oregon <br />97239) is the owner of real property located at Marche Chase Drive and Kinsrow Avenue, Eugene, <br />Oregon (Tax Lot 17-03-28-40-1406), and more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto <br />and incorporated herein by reference, and has submitted an application pursuant to Subsection 2.939(2) <br />of the Eugene Code, 1971 for an exemption from ad valorem taxes under the City's Low-Income Rental <br />Housing Property Tax Exemption Program (Sections 2.937 to 2.940 of the Eugene Code, 1971). <br /> <br /> B. The project, as proposed, will consist of 240 units of low-income rental housing units (60 <br />one-bedroom, 84 two-bedroom, and 96 three-bedroom units) and all of the property will be used for the <br />purpose of providing low-income rental housing. <br /> <br /> C. The Director of the Planning and Development Department, as designee of the City <br />Manager, has submitted a Report and Recommendation to the Council that the application be <br />disapproved and the exemption denied. In making that recommendation, the Director found that <br />although the applicant submitted all materials, documents and fees required by the application and the <br />City, and that the project is otherwise in compliance with applicable local plans, planning regulations, <br />the Metro Plan, and the criteria for approval as set forth in Subsection 2.939(2) of the Eugene Code, <br />1971, the project is not in compliance with all of the policies set forth in the Standards and Guidelines <br />adopted by Resolution No. 4623 of the City Council because the project is inconsistent with Policy 2 of <br />the City of Eugene's Housing Dispersal Policy which recommends housing developments of no more <br />than 60 units. <br /> <br /> D. The intergovernmental Housing Policy Board, an advisory committee comprised of <br />elected officials and appointed volunteers, also reviewed the application and unanimously recommended <br />denial based upon the project's noncompliance with Policy 2 of the Housing Dispersal Policy and <br />because the proposed rent levels are very close to market-rate. <br /> <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, <br /> <br /> BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a Municipal <br />Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows: <br /> <br /> Section 1. Based upon the above findings, which are adopted herein, and the City Council's <br />review of the Report and Recommendation of the Director of the Planning and Development <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2004 Council Agendas\MO40809\SO408094.doc <br /> <br /> <br />