My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2012
>
CC Agenda - 02/13/12 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2012 1:48:04 PM
Creation date
2/10/2012 11:35:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/13/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Chuck Hauk <br />, 2465 Parkview Drive, an employee of HACSA, supported Bascom Village because he <br />believed in a just and compassionate community and such housing was needed as demonstrated by the <br />many applications HACSA received for low-income housing assistance. He had lived in the region for <br />more than 31 years and it was clear to him the area in question would be developed. He asked if it was it <br />more desirable for the neighborhood to have regulated development or unregulated private development <br />that did not take into account the community’s need for well-managed affordable housing. He predicted <br />that the quality of management and construction at Bascom Village would be far superior to a comparable <br />private development. He also predicted that residents of Bascom Village would take advantage of the <br />housing to improve their lives and then they would move on. The development would provide needed <br />assistance to families who were already employed but could not afford the high rents of the current <br />market. He asked the council to support the proposal. <br /> <br />Larry Abel <br />, Executive Director of HACSA, spoke of the need that existed for affordable housing and the <br />lack of funding that existed. He said that funding for low-income housing had been dramatically reduced <br />in the face of greatly increased need. He said the community was fortunate that land bank sites were <br />available because they made development of Bascom Village feasible. He noted that the proposal was the <br />first joint submittal by HACSA and St. Vincent de Paul and he looked forward to the two agencies <br />working together to provide decent and safe low-income housing to residents. <br /> <br />Tom Moseman <br />, 2559 Parkview Drive, also supported Bascom Village and hoped to see a community <br />solution to the lack of low-income housing in Eugene. He suggested that it would have been challenging <br />for the neighbors to know the public intent for the site given it was not annexed and rezoned until 2009 <br />and 2010 and owned by the County previous to that. He appreciated that the HPB had slowed the process <br />but also felt that there was not much of a dialogue between the board and project neighbors. <br /> <br />Brian Land <br />, 2320 Devon Avenue, said he had two children in Sheldon High School and could confirm <br />the school was crowded. He believed the development would increase school crowding and wanted the <br />council to consider the cumulative impact of such projects. He pointed out the council had the ability to <br />decide the location of such projects relative to school capacity. Mr. Land said that everyone wanted a <br />positive experience for students and school crowding did not help. He said that neighbors were not <br />opposed to low-income housing and recognized the need; however, they wanted to be involved in the <br />decision-making process. He said that residents did expect that the Housing Dispersal Policy would be <br />considered, the 38 units on Matt Drive taken into account, and the lack of services would be addressed. <br />That did not occur. Mr. Land said a more collaborative approach was needed. <br /> <br />There being no other requests to speak, Mayor Piercy closed the public hearing. She thanked those who <br />spoke and said the council would consider their input. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark noted that he lived three blocks from the development site and believed the development <br />would place an additional burden on an already burdened transportation system. One could not get onto <br />Crescent Avenue at the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. With due respect to Ms. Thompson and Barb Bellamy <br />of School District 4J, Councilor Clark clarified that the district indicated it could absorb additional <br />students on a district-wide basis rather than on the basis of individual schools’ enrollments. He <br />questioned the enrollment numbers provided by the district. Councilor Clark reported he had discussed <br />the impact of the additional students his child’s school absorbed as a result of the closures of Coburg and <br />Meadowlark schools with the school principal and came away from that conversation believing there was <br />no way to add 100 additional students to area schools. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council November 21, 2011 Page 13 <br /> Public Hearing <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.