Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Review pursuant to EC 9.8650, although one is expected to be <br />provided at the time of future development. It is noted that the applicant’s proposed /PD overlay <br />zoning will ensure that the development occurs holistically for a comprehensive review of traffic <br />impacts and any associated mitigation. The purpose of the JRH report is to compare traffic <br />generation estimates between the existing and proposed zones and to evaluate how those trips <br />affect the transportation system, to demonstrate compliance with TPR. The JRH analysis is based <br />on a reasonable worst-case development scenario in regards to traffic generation for uses <br />permitted in the existing and proposed zones. <br /> <br />Land Use Designation Zoning Acreage <br />and Zone Change <br /> <br />Existing I-2 Light-Medium Industrial 27.9* <br />Proposed R-2 Medium-Density 22.2** <br />Residential <br />C-2 Community Commercial 3.2 <br /> <br />R-1 Low-Density Residential 2.49 <br /> <br />The applicant’s analysis included 1.1 less overall acres, as this area was added after the analysis. <br />Staff analysis includes the additional 1.1 acres and reaches the same conclusion of no significant <br />effect. <br />* Where the applicant’s materials identify the subject property as consisting of a larger area, those <br />refer to lands that are not being rezoned. <br />** The applicant’s analysis divides the R-2 zone into two categories: 10 acres to include a City Park <br />and the Amazon Channel; and 12.21 acres of Medium-Density Residential. Staff has combined <br />these because the applicant seeks the same zoning designation (R-2) for each, rather than seeking <br />a public land or natural resource designation for the area intended for parks and open space. <br /> <br />The applicant concludes that the requested land use designation and zone changes have no <br />significant effect, as defined by TPR, because it results in less trips than the existing zoning, upon a <br />comparison of reasonable worst-case development scenarios for each. <br /> <br />Existing Zoning Trip Generation <br />The applicant’s traffic estimates under the existing zoning begin on page 23 of the JRH report. <br />Table 7 of the JRH report divides the building area into the following uses: manufacturing, <br />restaurant, hardware/paint, drive-in bank, office, convenience market, and copy shop. Staff notes <br />that this mix of uses in the I-2 zone would require a site review or planned unit development, <br />pursuant to the special use limitations of EC 9.2451. All of the uses proposed by the applicant <br />could be achieved within these defined use limitations. The assumption set for building area is <br />acceptable, namely that 33% of the total acres would be building area while the remaining would <br />be used for parking, drives, loading area, landscaping, setbacks, and stormwater facilities. Given <br />the large size of the property, staff confirms that it is reasonable to estimate such a mix of uses <br />associated with a business park for the purposes of evaluating potential traffic generation. The <br />result of the applicant’s analysis for a worst-case scenario under the existing zoning is 803 p.m. <br />peak trips. As noted above, at the time of traffic analysis only 26.8 acres of property in I-2 zoning <br /> <br />Findings – Rexius Site/Amazon Meadows Page 8 <br /> <br /> <br />