My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 4: Ord. on Rexius-Amazon Meadows Metro Plan Amend
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2012
>
CC Agenda - 03/12/12 Meeting
>
Item 4: Ord. on Rexius-Amazon Meadows Metro Plan Amend
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 10:28:35 AM
Creation date
3/8/2012 4:34:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/12/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />was considered. Subsequently, 1.1 acres (for a total of 27.9 acres) was added to the proposal. <br />Using the applicant’s calculations, and adding in 1.1 acres, the estimated trip generation under <br />existing zoning would be 836 peak hour p.m. trips. <br /> <br />Proposed Zoning Trip Generation <br />The applicant’s traffic estimates under the proposed zoning begin on page 24 of the JRH report. <br />Table 8 of the JRH report provides a mix of uses that correlate with the proposed zoning as <br />follows: 14 single-family dwellings for the R-1 zone; 444 apartment units for the R-2 zone; and, <br />specialty retail, fast food drive-through, restaurant, convenience market, and general office for the <br />C-2 zone. The applicant’s analysis used the gross units per acre density maximum of 20 units per <br />acre for medium-density residential, and 10 units per acre for low-density residential. The worst- <br />case estimated trip generation for the residential development results in 280 p.m. peak trips. Staff <br />also confirms that the commercial uses listed in the applicant’s analysis are allowed within the C-2 <br />zone and represent a reasonable worst-case scenario. The result of the applicant’s analysis for a <br />worst-case scenario under the proposed C-2 zoning is 408 p.m. peak trips, for a total of 688 peak <br />hour p.m. trips. The added 1.1 acres of R-1 will generate 11 p.m. additional peak hour trips <br />resulting in an estimated 699 peak hour p.m. trips under the proposed zoning. <br /> <br />Net Effect Trip Generation <br />The applicant’s analysis shows, under a reasonable worst-case development scenario, that the <br />proposed mix of zonings results in less traffic than under the existing zoning. Staff concurs with <br />the applicant’s analysis. For example, the use with the highest trip generation rate is the <br />convenience market; the applicant’s analysis allocated this use, with identical factors, under the <br />existing and proposed zones. The greatest volume of trips between the two is also balanced. The <br />highest trip volume under the existing zone is the manufacturing use, which is estimated to have <br />222 p.m. peak trips; this is expected, as an anchor for an industrial park. The highest trip volume <br />under the proposed zone is the R-2 lands, within an estimated 262 p.m. peak trips. Even though <br />the R-2 zone is not projected at the ultimate maximum density, it is toward the upper range, <br />especially from a net-acreage basis, and has more trips than the industrial anchor of the existing <br />zone. Staff also notes that the applicant did not subtract the possible future park site from the R-2 <br />area calculations. Further, of the restaurant uses contemplated under existing and proposed <br />zones, the applicant applied the highest traffic generating restaurant, fast food with drive-through, <br />to the proposed C-2 zone. <br /> <br />Based on the above findings, there is no significant effect to the transportation system caused by <br />the proposed zonings, as the result is a net reduction in p.m. peak hour trips. Therefore, there is <br />no need to further evaluate the existing and projected performance of the transportation system <br />to demonstrate compliance with TPR. <br /> <br />The applicant has, however, provided an intersection performance analysis, beginning on page 39 <br />of the JRH report. The purpose of this analysis is to acknowledge that development of this scale <br />(under existing or proposed zonings) would require a TIA at the time of development, per EC <br />9.8650 though EC 9.8680. The analysis shows that, under the same assumption set for the <br />reasonable worst-case development scenario for the proposed zones, the additional traffic will <br />th <br />reduce the performance of two intersections below applicable mobility standards: 11 <br />th <br />Avenue/Bailey Hill; and 13 Avenue/Bailey Hill. Staff notes that this is more of an academic and <br /> <br />Findings – Rexius Site/Amazon Meadows Page 9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.