My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMinutes - 06/14/04 Mtg
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2004
>
CCMinutes - 06/14/04 Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:29:03 AM
Creation date
8/10/2004 10:07:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
willing to pay its way and was projected to only raise the amount of effluent by one percent. <br /> <br />Roxie Cuellar, 2053 Laura Street, representing the Lane County Home Builders Association, submitted <br />testimony in writing. She alleged the facilities plan was tied too closely to SDCs. She predicted the addition <br />of Coburg would affect the project list and, as such, thought a decision should be deferred until it was <br />known whether Coburg would join. She thought the SDC issue could be settled without the facilities plan. <br />She asserted the public had not adequately weighed in on the plan and urged the City Council to call for <br />more public examination of it. Ms. Cuellar asserted that the community was only just getting involved. <br /> <br />Mike Hudson, 2760 Chuckanut Street, spoke as the City administrator for Coburg. He echoed the <br />comments of Ms. Volta, and reiterated the desire of Coburg to be a part of a new facility. He suggested that <br />Coburg could hold back its flow during peak hours if necessary. He said it was ecologically and economi- <br />cally appropriate for a partnership. He stressed that Coburg had no interest in "punching a hole" in the <br />urban growth boundary (UGB). He noted that the community of Turner had successfully formed a regional <br />wastewater district with the City of Salem. <br /> <br />Terry Connolly, 1401 Willamette Street, Chamber of Commerce, asserted that the MWMC Facilities Plan <br />and 20-Year Project List were very complex and technical. He said, post review of the plan, the chamber <br />was uncertain whether the plan was too much, too little, or too soon. As such, the chamber did not support <br />or oppose the project list, but was not indifferent to it as the $144 million price tag was the type of <br />infrastructure expense that warranted the attention of the chamber and of the public. He listed questions that <br />could illustrate items needing explanation before the public, as follows: <br /> · How often does the region currently fail to meet 100 percent peak wet weather flow treatment <br /> and would any of those occurrences have required a capacity expansion anywhere near the <br /> magnitude of the 102 million gallons per day called for by the MWMC Facilities Plan? <br /> · Is DEQ requiring the MWMC to build to the worst case scenario that may never occur and, if <br /> so, have those assumptions been challenged? <br /> · In terms of capacity size and system performance relative to population and total number of us- <br /> ers, does the MWMC plan exceed, do less than, or be on par with what other communities were <br /> having to do? <br />Mr. Connelly related the chamber's request that the council get as much information as it needed to make an <br />informed decision, given that the plan represented a substantial investment. <br /> <br />Craig Costello, 481 Ventura Street, expressed great respect for the MWMC Facilities Plan and hope that <br />Coburg could be a partner in it. <br /> <br />Phil Barnhart, 182 Sunset Drive, State Representative for House District 11, spoke in support of Coburg's <br />position on the issue of the potential expansion of the MWMC to include it. He called Coburg an "economic <br />engine" for the area with people moving back and forth over the "artificial boundaries" created by <br />government all of the time. He urged the city councils of Eugene and Springfield and the Lane Board of <br />County Commissioners to consider an expansion, over the course of this project, to include the City of <br />Coburg. He felt a pipeline between Coburg and Eugene would not be a difficult undertaking and would <br />ultimately provide cost savings. <br /> <br />Diana Abernathey, 2620 Oak Street, expressed appreciation for the councilors' service to the community. <br />She averred there may not be adequate protection of the water quality of the Willamette River. She urged <br />support for the plan before the council. A great deal of money had already been spent in determining <br />technical options, costing them out, and selecting the best of them. She called the process efficient and <br />effective and said the staff members, with input from citizen advisors, had selected the least cost alternative <br />that would meet the new federal guide lines. She commented that, while some complain of the high cost of <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.