My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMinutes - 06/14/04 Mtg
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2004
>
CCMinutes - 06/14/04 Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:29:03 AM
Creation date
8/10/2004 10:07:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
appointed citizens from the cities of Springfield and Eugene and from Lane County, saw a need to evaluate <br />the whole plan. She related that the commission's consultant, CH2M Hill, and staff had worked diligently to <br />produce the plan, designed to meet new national pollution discharge elimination system requirements. She <br />noted the new elements the facility was required to address, the ammonia, the temperature of effluent in the <br />warmer part of the year, and a status quo on discharged solid waste. Additionally, she said the plan had to <br />improve the ability to handle stream flow increases in wet weather periods and accommodate future <br />population increases and possible businesses that would settle here. <br /> <br />Ms. Ballew reported that numerous opportunities for public involvement had been provided. She stated that <br />the commission had spent many hours reviewing the document before the council. She recommended the <br />council adopt the MWMC Facilities Plan and 20-Year Project List. <br /> <br />Walt Myer, 3982 Brae Burn Drive, citizen appointee to the MWMC and Eugene resident, stated that the <br />City had a responsibility to plan, build, and operate wastewater treatment facilities so that wastewater <br />discharged into the river was clean and protected the river. He asserted the facilities plan laid out such a <br />plan. He shared that he worked for an environmental engineering firm that worked in many of the counties <br />in Oregon. He assured the council that the plan before it was the right plan and met important goals. He <br />said it would allow the City to protect the river and would plan for growth. He underscored that the plan <br />maximized existing investment. Many of the improvements were retrofits and fixes of facilities. He urged <br />support for the plan. <br /> <br />Charles Biggs, 540 Antelope Way, expressed his uncertainty as to whether this was the right plan for the <br />area. He related that the public hearings were held at 7:30 a.m. and were not well attended. He felt this <br />hampered public input. <br /> <br />Mr. Biggs thought the gravel facility north of Beltline Road, rumored to be closing, could be utilized as a <br />bio-swale which would reduce the temperature and act as another filter. He recommended the council <br />oppose the plan. <br /> <br />Joshua Skov, 2089 Garfield Street, said he was a member of the SDC committee, a citizen of Eugene, and a <br />business owner. He noted his comments would address both items subject to public hearings. He stated that <br />the proposed facility would protect the quality of life in that it addressed continued population growth. He <br />underscored that the MWMC had met its charge as it had done %xcellent work" in engaging a number of <br />constituencies. If some views had not prevailed, it was not due to lack of representation. He called the <br />SDCs low by any current standard and said every comparable community in Oregon had higher SDCs. He <br />attributed the lack of higher SDCs to the past good work of the MWMC. He felt the current SDCs to be <br />abnormally low and, as such, they provided poor context for comparison to the proposed changes to the <br />SDC methodology. He supported ~getting on with the improvements." <br /> <br />Judy Volta, 91070 South Willamette Street, Mayor of Coburg, spoke in support of the MWMC 20-Year <br />Project List. She noted that Coburg had a population of 2,000, but employed 3,500. She related that it was <br />one of the last cities of its size in the state that did not have its own wastewater system. Industries ran on <br />septic systems. She said Coburg had recently been declared a regional groundwater management area due to <br />nitrate contamination. She shared that Coburg had participated in the annual United Front lobbying trip to <br />Washington, DC, and its representatives were asked if the area was working as a region to solve the <br />problem. Ms. Volta stated that, out of necessity, Coburg was working on a stand-alone wastewater facility. <br />She conveyed the desire of Coburg to work with the region to resolve wastewater issues. She said assurance <br />had been received from the Governor's Economic Revitalization Team that it would look for funding for a <br />feasibility study to look into the possibilities and whether it would be a good idea for Coburg be a part of the <br />MWMC. She asked the council to allow this discussion to take place. She emphasized that Coburg was <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.