My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: Rental Housing Code
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2012
>
CC Agenda - 04/18/12 Work Session
>
Item A: Rental Housing Code
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2012 1:59:41 PM
Creation date
4/13/2012 1:46:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/18/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment A <br />Rental Housing Code Staff Report – April 18, 2012 <br /> <br /> <br />STAKEHOLDER INPUT <br />To obtain the opinions of tenants, tenant advocates, property owners, managers and <br />neighborhood groups concerned with housing conditions staff conducted a survey. The City <br />received 603 responses. A brief summary of those responses follows and the full report is <br />included as an appendix to this report. <br /> <br /> <br />Survey responders self-identified their relationship to rental housing with a distribution of <br />about 43% owners and property managers to just over 51% renters and others (6% did <br />not identify). <br /> <br /> <br />Over 50% of respondents reported that the code supported the City goals of safe <br />community, effective, accountable municipal government, and fair, stable, and adequate <br />financial resources either somewhat or a lot; and 60% of respondents felt the program <br />supports community livability either somewhat or a lot. <br /> <br /> <br />A majority of 67% of respondents felt that the annual $10 unit cost was reasonable. <br /> <br /> <br />When asked about possible changes to the code, 64% of respondents agreed that the time <br />between the verification of a housing concern and the deadline for its repair should be <br />reduced in some cases. Currently an owner has as long as 20 days (10 day notice plus 10 <br />days for repair) to make fixes and if the problem is the lack of heat in the winter, the a <br />majority of respondents consider that too long a time. <br /> <br /> <br />Pests and vermin, functional appliance, and energy efficiency topped the list of other <br />housing conditions that respondents, who answered the questions, felt the code should <br />address. <br /> <br /> <br />HOUSING POLICY BOARD REVIEW <br />The Housing Policy Board (HPB) under the guidance of Chair, Norton Cabell, agreed review the <br />Rental Housing Code. A committee of HPB members and owner representatives was formed <br />and met five times over six weeks. At the conclusion of their meetings, recommendations were <br />forward back to the Board. Below are the recommendations of the HPB and the full memo from <br />Chair, Norton Cabell to the HPB is attached in Appendix B <br />The full list of Housing Policy Board recommendations are as follows: <br /> <br /> <br />1.That the rental housing code program be continued, but modified. None of the <br />recommended modifications would require altering the code language. The first six <br />could be initiated by city staff; the last two would take City Council action. <br /> <br /> <br />2.That staff explore methods for reducing the cost of the program and pass those savings <br />on in the form of fee reductions (not letting the current surplus grow). The biggest <br />possible saving could come from offering some form of multi-year billing. Other ideas <br />are discounts for online billing and payment, discounts for large accounts, and making <br />the late charge provide more incentive to pay on time. <br /> <br />11 | Page <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.