Laserfiche WebLink
generated by the WOW Hall would not be compatible with neighbors. <br /> <br />Kathy Saranpa, 3015 Friendly Street, said quaint, circuitous roadways in a hilly forested area character- <br />ized the Crest Drive neighborhood. She opined that nothing was gained by reclassifying the street as a <br />%ollector." She felt this was a one-size-fits-all approach to a unique neighborhood. She opposed City <br />engineers' recommendation to redesignate streets. She opined that the decision, made without citizen input, <br />was akin to taxation without representation. She noted the plaque at the back of the wall stated that the <br />people are the City. She asked the City Council to follow through on this ideal and support the neighbor- <br />hood opposition to this street reclassification. <br /> <br />Davy Ray, 276 North Grand, declined to speak as he was unable to trim his testimony to a two-minute <br />version. <br /> <br />Charles H. Spencer, 3390 Honeywood Street, spoke on behalf of the Eugene/Springfield Solidarity <br />Network, the local affiliate of Jobs with Justice. He urged the council to pass a moratorium on develop- <br />ment of large-scale retail facilities over 15,000 square feet. He suggested the community, the council, and <br />the Eugene Planning Commission needed time to identify reasonable long-term solutions to the problems <br />highlighted by Wal-Mart's plans to build a %uper center" in Eugene. He submitted 70 cards signed by <br />residents who agree that Wal-Mart should not be allowed to do so. He commented that, like many citizens <br />of Eugene, he was worried about Wal-Mart's impact on the community. He stressed that Wal-Mart stores <br />were anti-competitive and once local stores closed, Wal-Mart stores often raised prices. He underscored <br />the need to develop viable standards, the need to reconsider zoning strategies, and to claim a role in <br />determining what happens within the community. <br /> <br />Don Neet, 3436 Storey Boulevard, related that he had attended a Goal 5 meeting in 2002 and had been <br />told, at that time, that the Crest Drive was unique and needed to be kept safe. He noted there were <br />approximately 3,500 acres within the urban growth boundary (UGB) that were designated at wildlife <br />habitat. Most of this land was in undeveloped areas, but Storey Boulevard and Crest Drive were <br />considered wildlife and riparian corridors. He felt the change in classification for the street ran counter to <br />preservation of the riparian corridor. He stated that the neighborhood would not benefit from the <br />designation of Crest Drive as a collector. <br /> <br />Virginia Starling, 3302 Storey Boulevard, stated that the Planning Commission would be forwarding its <br />recommendation to the council that Crest Drive, Storey Boulevard, and Friendly Street be designated as <br />collector streets in her neighborhood. She urged the council, on behalf of herself and her neighbors, to <br />oppose this designation. She opined that the hilly and curving streets would provide significant road <br />construction problems that would be costly and also injurious to abutting properties. She also felt the <br />effects of such a project on the riparian streams in the area would cause irreparable damage. She added <br />that the council and Mayor had a reputation for being sensitive to citizen opinion. She wished to share the <br />neighborhood's desire to keep the area pristine in nature and unmarred by free-flowing traffic made up of <br />cars passing through from one area of the city to another. She thought there were more efficient ways to <br />ease traffic into the downtown area and emphasized that the neighborhood would not benefit from approval <br />of the reclassification. <br /> <br />Debra E. McGee, 29755 Lusk Road, spoke in favor of sustainable development that supported local <br />businesses. She said local businesses enrich the civic fabric of the community as local merchants care <br />about the communities they were a part of. She added that local ownership meant that profit circulated <br />within the community as opposed to national chain stores. She opposed Wal-Mart's plans to build a <br />%uper center." She alleged that such stores sell food products below cost to undermine other smaller <br />stores. She felt the stability of the local existing business districts was undermined resulting in an increase <br />in empty store fronts. Noting that some people would say the community would benefit from an increase in <br /> <br /> <br />