My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5: Action - Ord. on Land Use Code Amend - Infill Standards
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2012
>
CC Agenda - 05/14/12 Meeting
>
Item 5: Action - Ord. on Land Use Code Amend - Infill Standards
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2012 1:32:00 PM
Creation date
5/10/2012 5:27:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/14/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HANSEN Alissa H <br />From:Gordon Anslow <gordon@adhomes.com> <br />Tuesday, April 24, 2012 11:37 AM <br />Sent: <br />To:HANSEN Alissa H <br />Subject:ICS record <br />Alissaʹ <br />Thanksformeetingwithusyesterday.RegardingthetwopagesIgaveyoulistingprojectswehavebuiltinthe <br />area,andlikelyimpactoftheICSproposednewregswillhaveonthem(whichIwroteinredpen),Iwouldliketorequest <br />thatyouaddthesetotherecordassubmittalsrelatedtotheICSproposalsnowunderconsideration.(Iunderstandthe <br />recordisstillopen.)IĚŝĚŶ͛ƚmakeacopyformyrecords;Iwouldalsoverymuchappreciateitifyoucouldmakeacopy <br />oremailapdftome,soIhavearecordofit. <br />Forwhateverreason,Iseemtobeoneofthepeopleintownmorefamiliarthanmostwithhowallthese <br />regulatorymeasuresinteractandaffectwhatyoucandowithagivenpieceofproperty.(Idothisinsteadofhavinga <br />life,ofcourse!)Itriedtoberealisticinthesecomments.Insomecases,Ihadliterallylookedduringdesignatwhatwas <br />possibleifthedensitythresholdǁĂƐŶ͛ƚmet,soitŝƐŶ͛ƚidlespeculation.Itisfairtosaythatasageneralrule,if20%of <br />thelandareaisgivenovertoopenspace(ie,nobuildingonoroverit),areductionof15%to20%ofcapacity <br />occurs.Thisvariesdependingonthingslikeshapeandproportionsofalot,howmuchfrontageonstreets, <br />encroachmentbynearbybuildings,andmanyothervariables,butthe15to20%rangeisʹifanything,onthe <br />conservativeside,astohowmuchimpactthiswillhaveonabilitytoachieveacertaindensity. <br />Naturally,onecouldsayʹ͞zŽƵcanachievethesamedensity,butwith1bedroomĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͘͟Yes,youcould <br />meettheofficialdefinitionofdensity,butthetrueaffectofhowmanypeoplecanbeaccommodatedisperhapsthe <br />bettermeasureofwhattherealimpactis,whetherforbetterorworse.(Dependsonyourviewofwhetherhigher <br />densityisagoodthing,orabadthing.)Inatleastsomequarters,higherdensityisseenasreducingdemandfor <br />expansionoftheUGB,makingbetteruseoffiniteresources,andreducingdependencyontransportationtoconductthe <br />affairsofŽŶĞƐ͛life. <br />Thankyouforyourattentiontothis. <br />Regards, <br />Gordon <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.