My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20492
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2012 No. 20485-20503
>
Ordinance No. 20492
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2012 3:54:53 PM
Creation date
6/4/2012 3:43:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
5/14/2012
Document_Number
20492
CMO_Effective_Date
6/15/2012
Author
Kitty Piercy
Supplemental fields
Document_Title
An Ordinance Concerning Infill Compatibility Standards Related to Multi-Family Developments, ...; and Amending Sections 9.0500, 9.2750, 9.2751, 9.3125, 9.3626, 9.5500, 9.6105, 9.6410, 9.6740, 9.6745, and 9.8030 of the Eugene Code, 1971.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. Provides an equivalent or greater degree of vehicular and <br />pedestrian circulation. <br />2. Traditional block patterns that reduce the apparent scale of large <br />developments by breaking the site up into smaller land units. <br />(See also EC 9.6810 Block Length <br />(e) Site Access and Internal Circulation The requirements set forth in EC <br />9.5500(11) may be adjusted in accordance with the criteria in this <br />subsection. In the case of an adjustment, all of the following standards <br />apply: <br />1. Sidewalks may be designed as curbside walks only along those <br />portions of the private streets providing parallel on- street parking. <br />2. Street trees may be placed in tree wells or adjacent to the <br />sidewalk. <br />(f) Vehicle Parking The requirements set forth in EC 9.5500(12) may be <br />adjusted if the proposal achieves to the same degree as would strict <br />compliance with the standards all of the following: <br />1. Limitations on the use of continuous parking drives in large -scale <br />multiple - family developments. <br />2. Limitations on the size of individual parking lots in multiple - family <br />development. <br />3. Minimal negative aspects of parking uses in multiple - family <br />developments. <br />Where cost considerations preclude parking beneath or within <br />residential buildings, combinations of partial and interrupted parking <br />drives; on- street parking; and small, dispersed parking courts are an <br />acceptable alternative. <br />(30) Driveways and Parking Areas in R -3 and R -4. The standards at EC <br />9.2751(15)(1) may be adjusted if the applicant demonstrates that any <br />hardscaped or non - landscaped areas are separated from the driveway and <br />associated parking area, and that vehicle access and parking is physically <br />precluded. <br />Section 12 . Figure 9.2751(8) is adopted as reflected on Exhibit A attached to this <br />Ordinance. <br />Section 13 . Figure 9.2751(13)(b)1. is relabeled as Figure 9.2751(14)(b)1. as reflected on <br />Exhibit B attached to this Ordinance. <br />Section 14 . Figure 9.2751(15) is adopted as reflected on Exhibit C attached to this <br />Ordinance. <br />Section 15 . Map 9.5500(9)(a)2.d. is adopted as reflected on Exhibit D attached to this <br />Ordinance. <br />Ordinance - Page 15 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.