Laserfiche WebLink
%88%',1)28( <br />Central Services <br />Finance Division <br />Memorandum <br /> <br />City of Eugene <br />th <br /> 100 West 10 Ave., Ste 400 <br />Date: July 11, 2012 Eugene, Oregon 97401 <br /> (541) 682-5127 <br />To: Jon Ruiz, City Manager (541) 682-5802 FAX <br /> <br />From: Jessica Mumme, Program Coordinator, Finance & Intergovernmental Relations <br />Subject: League of Oregon Cities (LOC) Legislative Priority Setting <br />Synopsis of Recommendation <br />With direct input from the City’s Legislative Coordinators, and review of the previous actions of the <br />Intergovernmental Relations Committee (IGR) and the full City Council, the following two items rose to the <br />top as high priorities for our City and the League of Oregon Cities to add to their legislative agenda: <br />General Government Reform the court fines system in a manner that recognizes the value <br />of both state and local courts. (Item F) <br />Telecommunications Pass legislation renewing the 9-1-1 tax. (Item K) <br />City staff has worked for many years on both of these topics, and these are not new issues to the <br />legislature. <br />th <br />Item F: In 2009, the 75 Legislative Assembly enacted House Bill 2287. The measure established an <br />eight-member Joint Interim Committee on State Justice System Revenues to make recommendations on <br />Oregon Judicial Department fees, fines and surcharges, and to recommend distribution of the temporary <br />fee and surcharge revenue to justice system entities. Representative Nancy Nathanson co-chaired this <br />Committee. The Committee found that the current court revenue structure is exceptionally complex and <br />lacks transparency. As directed by House Bill 2287, the Committee put forward three legislative concepts <br />related to the civil and criminal state justice revenue structure; Legislative Concept 364-1, Legislative <br />Concept 1168, and Legislative Concept 1168-1. Generally speaking, the recommendations would simplify <br />the current criminal and civil revenue and collections process, preserve access to justice, provide <br />transparency, and prepare for the implementation of the Oregon Court Program. The result of the three <br />Legislative Concepts, which affects cities, is the local jurisdiction requirement to submit the first $60 of a <br />traffic fine to the state. This requirement, along with other changes made to court fine amounts, has <br />resulted in detrimental fiscal impacts to municipal courts and has the possibility of threatening their <br />continued operation. <br />Item K: Kristi Wilde, the 9-1-1 Communication’s Program Manager, has actively worked on 9-1-1 issues <br />affecting the City of Eugene, and the entire State of Oregon. Revenues derived from 9-1-1 taxes are an <br />extremely important revenue source for local governments. Cities receive approximately $13 million per <br />biennium which they must pass through to the governing authority of the 9-1-1 jurisdiction serving that <br />city. This is the backbone of the budget that supports the planning, installation, maintenance, operation <br />and improvements of the 9-1-1 system. These funds are supposed to be used only for purposes of <br />handling citizen’s calls to a network of primary and secondary Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs) <br />and local emergency responders. The statutory authorization for the collection of this tax contains a six- <br />year sunset provision, and is due to expire on December 31, 2014. Additionally, pre-paid cell phone and <br />VoIP users do not currently pay the 9-1-1 tax. Legislation attempting to correct this inequity has been <br />introduced in prior legislative sessions but failed. <br />The items that City staff has recommended as secondary items of interest include: <br />