Laserfiche WebLink
Community Development The Jobs/Economic Development Initiative that supports funding for <br />industrial site development. (Item A) <br />General Government Pass legislation that will allow cities greater authority to regulate <br />liquor serving establishments. (Item H) <br />Human Resources Clarify that binding arbitration decisions may be overturned when <br />those decisions violate public policy interests as defined by a local <br />government. (Item J) <br />Telecommunications Defeat legislation mandating the consolidation of Public Safety <br />Answering Points (PSAPs). (Item L) <br />Transportation While supporting the creation of a dedicated, non-roadway <br />transportation fund, oppose any attempt to fund it from existing <br />revenue streams – especially transfers from local governments to the <br />state.(Item O) <br />Item A: This is a top priority for our Eugene Airport. <br />Item H: Our Police Department and 9-1-1 Program Manager have identified this as a high priority for their <br />departments. <br />Item J: Our Police Department and Human Resources Division identify this as a priority item for their <br />departments. <br />Item L: City staff firmly believes that PSAP consolidation should be locally driven, and that any program <br />savings that result from consolidations should be redirected towards the actual cost of providing 9-1-1 <br />services, not as a means to better pay for State general fund expenses. The Office of Emergency <br />Management recently changed gears with one of the Legislative Concept placeholders. Rather than <br />submit more refined language to fund a PSAP Consolidation Incentive Fund, they are submitting a bill to <br />recommend that the 48 remaining PSAPs be consolidated into 9 regional centers. Our CLCC would likely <br />be one of the 9 regional centers. Staff has met with Representative Nancy Nathanson and informed her <br />that we want our legislative leadership to call the question on consolidation. We expected to see a <br />proposal for one PSAP per county. City staff will be heavily involved in this legislation regardless of if the <br />League of Oregon Cities has a priority for this item. <br />Item O: Our Public Works Engineering staff and Finance/Disbursements staff identify this as a priority <br />item for their departments. <br />Previous Action from IGR and City Council <br />In August of 2008, the full City Council voted on the League of Oregon Cities 2009 legislative agenda. <br />The IGR Committee put forth five recommendations: changes to the property tax system; increased <br />regulation on mental theft; transportation funding package; climate change legislation and; Oregon <br />wireless interoperability network. The full City Council moved to approve these recommendations with a <br />6:1 vote, Councilor Bettman voting no. <br />In June of 2010, the IGR Committee voted on the League of Oregon Cities 2011 legislative agenda. This <br />did not go before full City Council. The IGR Committee recommended 7 legislative priorities at this <br />meeting: reauthorization of BETC; overhaul of the property tax system; 9-1-1 tax for pre-paid cell phones; <br />healthcare cost containment; additional funding for multi-modal transit and rail; recapitalize state <br />municipal infrastructure funds and; protect existing and future water rights. <br />