Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Budget (FY2010-2011: July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012) <br /> <br />We project to return approximately $20,000 of our total budget to the City as cost savings for the fiscal <br />year ending June 30, 2012. Our total budget appropriation is approximately $416,000. Cost savings are <br />being realized due to not having a need to use personnel savings. <br />This also allowed us to provide much needed training opportunities for staff and CRB members. My <br />expectation for FY2011-2012 is that with a full staff complement, our budget will require cuts in training <br />and other non-personnel costs. <br /> <br />Audited Cases <br /> <br />The OPA audits all complaint investigations, including service complaints (even though not required by <br />from <br />the complainant or referred by another agency including the police. The OPA classifies each complaint. <br />Allegations of misconduct are investigated by Internal Affairs. The Internal Affairs investigations are <br />closely monitored by the OPA including attendance and participation in interviews, reviews of in-car <br />video and other evidence, and weekly progress reports with senior management. The Auditor then <br />command, and provides an adjudication recommendation to the Police Chief. <br /> <br />Other complaints are classified as policy complaints, service complaints and inquiries. Most of these <br />cases involve substantial work and effort in an attempt to resolve or explain issues that the complainant <br />may have. Inquiries typically occur when the complainant information is incomplete and EPD must <br />conduct additional research for our review before the complaint is classified. This may involve EPD staff <br />time to convert digital ICV information to CDs for review, compilation of police reports and any other <br />pertinent information. In each case, while not at the investigative level of most allegations, a substantial <br />amount of staff time is spent on research, outreach to complainants and involved officers, and after <br />explanation, follow up surveys. <br /> <br />After complaint intake and classification, those complaints classified as service complaints are <br />eport moves <br />up through the chain of command. A copy of the report is sent to the OPA for review and determination <br />of completeness and thoroughness. <br /> <br />Policy complaints are allegations which identify an involved officer but the officer was likely following <br />established EPD operational procedures and/or training. An example of a policy complaint is the use of <br />SWAT for a barricaded person. Once the Auditor has classified a complaint as a policy complaint, a <br />sergeant from internal affairs is assigned to identify the policy involved, whether the policy was applied <br />appropriately, and whether the policy could be revised. Usually, the sergeant will also contact the <br />complainant to explain the policy. Again, the report of the supervisor moves up the chain of command. <br />8 <br /> <br />