My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: Tri-Annual Report to CC from Police Auditor
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2012
>
CC Agenda - 09/12/12 - Work Session
>
Item A: Tri-Annual Report to CC from Police Auditor
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2012 1:50:18 PM
Creation date
9/21/2012 11:56:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/12/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />A copy of the report is sent to the OPA for review and determination of completeness and <br />thoroughness. <br /> <br />Complaints may also be informally resolved through mediation. It is a voluntary opportunity for officers <br />to enhance their customer service skills and for members of the public to develop understanding of <br />police procedures and operations. If during intake, a complaint seems appropriate for mediation, the <br />OPA asks the complainant if they are interested in mediation and explains the program. If the <br />complainant is interested, a note is made in the database and the involved officer is contacted. <br />Mediation requires the approval and consent of the auditor, the police chief, the involved officer and <br />the complainant. <br /> <br />The OPA has had a significant impact on the course and outcomes of investigations. An external <br />assessment of these processes broadens the understandings police have with regard to citizen <br />complaints and the important issues that arise from these complaints. <br /> <br /> <br />Related Data* <br />*(At times complaint numbers may not match up exactly, particularly in cases where the date of the incident occurred in a year <br />prior to the deposition: i.e.: complaint filed in December but adjudicated in February.) <br /> <br />ϮϬϭϭƚŽƚĂůƉŽůŝĐĞĐĂůůƐĨŽƌƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ;ǁŚĞƌĞƉŽůŝĐĞƌĞƐƉŽŶĚĞĚŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐŽĨĨŝĐĞƌŝŶŝƚŝĂƚĞĚͿ͗104,660 (up <br />approximately 7% from 2010); (2009: 98,796; 2010: 97,277) <br /> <br />ϮϬϭϬƚŽƚĂůĐƵƐƚŽĚLJĂƌƌĞƐƚƐĂŶĚŵŝƐĚĞŵĞĂŶŽƌĐŝƚĂƚŝŽŶƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐh//ĂƌƌĞƐƚƐ;ϱϵϲh//ĂƌƌĞƐƚƐͿ͗ 15,471 <br />(2009: 16,358; 2010: 14,626) <br /> <br />ϮϬϭϬĐƵƐƚŽĚLJĂƌƌĞƐƚƐĂŶĚŵŝƐĚĞŵĞĂŶŽƌĐŝƚĂƚŝŽŶƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐh//ĂƌƌĞƐƚƐƉĞƌĐĂƉŝƚĂĂƌƌĞƐƚƐ;ďĂƐĞĚŽŶ <br />ĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚƉŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶŽĨϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬͿƌĂƚĞ: 0.099 <br /> <br />ϮϬϭϭdĂƐĞƌĚŝƐĐŚĂƌŐĞƐ͗20; 43 incidents where a Taser warning was given but not discharged <br />ϮϬϭϬdĂƐĞƌĚŝƐĐŚĂƌŐĞƐ: 20 (2009: 24) <br /> <br />dŽƚĂůhŶŝĨŽƌŵĞĚdƌĂĨĨŝĐŝƚĂƚŝŽŶƐ͗ <br /> <br />2011: 13,133 <br />2010: 16,760 <br />2009: 18,299 <br />2008: 15,282 <br /> <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.