Laserfiche WebLink
SECTION 3 Flood Control Euaination <br />3.5.2 Selected Projects to Address Flows Associated With Drywell Decommissioning <br />As stated previously, DEQ is expected to require decommissioning of all the public drywells in <br />the basin (more detail is provided in Section 4.0). As a result, alternative systems will be <br />necessary to handle the flows (up to the 5 -year, 24 hour design event) that were previously <br />handled through drywells. The drywell drainage areas were reviewed, and three project options <br />were developed to handle the flows from these areas as follows: <br />1) Piped Option — If the drywell is located in close proximity to an existing storm drainage pipe <br />and the pipe has the capacity to handle the flow, a new piped system would be constructed as <br />necessary to route the drywell flows to the existing piped system. <br />2) Surface Infiltration/Rain Garden Option — If the drywell is located in an area where flow is <br />not able to be routed to an existing piped system, flows would be routed to an area where a <br />vegetated infiltration /rain garden type facility would be constructed to handle flows. Infiltration <br />of municipal stormwater runoff that occurs through the ground surface as opposed to the <br />subsurface is not regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act. <br />3) On- Street Rain Garden Option — In areas where street improvements are planned, right -of- <br />way plans /cross - sections that include street side rain gardens for the storage and infiltration of <br />runoff could be used to handle flows from the right -of -way (ROW). For this option, properties <br />adjacent to the R.O.W. would be required to deal with their individual drainage on -site in <br />accordance with requirements for stormwater in the City of Eugene Code (Chapter 9, Section <br />9.6791(3)). <br />Many of the drywells are concentrated in various portions of the basin. Therefore, prior to <br />selecting an option for the individual drywells, drywells located in close proximity to each other <br />where flows were proposed to be managed in accordance with the same option as defined above, <br />were grouped into drywell "clusters ". This grouping of drywells was conducted because some <br />of the management options could be applied and constructed in a manner to address a "cluster" <br />of drywells. A total of 39 drywell clusters were delineated, as illustrated on the Stormwater <br />Management Strategy Development map in Appendix H and listed in Table 3 -6 below. Table 3- <br />6 also lists the CPs associated with each drywell cluster to address decommissioning of the <br />drywells. A capital project fact sheet including a map, estimated costs, and conceptual design <br />assumptions is provided for each of these projects in Appendix A, and the location of each of <br />these projects is also shown in Figures 3 -2 through 3 -8. The project options were selected for <br />each cluster to maximize water quality benefits while addressing the flows associated with <br />decommissioning. See Section 4.0 — Water Quality Evaluation for more detail regarding the <br />development of each of these projects. <br />0:A25695978 Eugene RR -SC Final Basin P1an\Master P1anTINAL 2- 2010\Master_Plan 3- 11- 10_FINAL_ Word _Version.doc 3-13 <br />