Laserfiche WebLink
The threshold number can be changed by the council to $250,000. Because the Type Two <br /> amendments must meet both tests (substantial change in the plan's objectives and exceeding <br /> $500,000) the amount does not refer to an annual figure, but rather a single amendment or package <br /> of amendments. <br /> <br />Additional Background on the Process Used to Update the Plan <br />In January 2003, the council began a multi-step process to implement the Vision for a Greater <br />Downtown Eugene. This and the recently updated Downtown Plan include recommendations to enact <br />implementation tools, including using urban renewal as a financing tool. Since January 2003, the new <br />Downtown Plan has been adopted, two property tax exemption programs have been put into place, <br />downtown loan programs have been created, and the Riverfront Urban Renewal Plan was updated. <br /> <br />In March 2004, the LIRA voted to forward the proposed amendments to the Downtown UR Plan to other <br />taxing districts, the Planning Commission, and the public for comment. These amendments included: <br />1) removing the restriction on the use of tax increment funds solely for library projects; 2) extending the <br />district timeline to 2029; and 3) changing the maximum indebtedness. ERAC and the Planning <br />Commission recommended the first two elements but did not recommend changing the maximum <br />indebtedness as part of this amendment process. Other amendments reflect the council's previous <br />direction on projects, method of amending the Downtown UR Plan in the future, and changing language <br />in the plan to conform to current State statutes. <br /> <br />As required by State statute, the impacted taxing jurisdictions have been notified and sent a copy of the <br />proposed amendments to the Downtown UR Plan. A Lane County Finance committee that included <br />three commissioners met with City of Eugene staff. While some members lamented the impact of tax <br />increment financing on the County, they did not take a position on the updated plan. In addition to the <br />August public hearing, these amendments have been the subject of significant opportunity for public <br />comment. At each of the public information sessions related to the update of the Downtown Plan, use of <br />urban renewal funding was highlighted as a tool. For example, one event, "Lookin' Forward at <br />Downtown," drew over 125 people during the December 5, 2003, First Friday Artwalk. In addition to <br />visual displays and handouts, staff encouraged comments. That event was advertised in both the <br />Register-Guard and Eugene Weekly. <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />Improving the viability of downtown has been a community and City Council goal, in some form, for <br />decades. The adopted Growth Management Policies, the Vision for Greater Downtown Eugene, the <br />Council's 2001-2002 Vision and Goals Statement, and the new Downtown Plan all include policies <br />or strategies to create a more vital downtown. There is a close relationship between urban renewal <br />goals and these policies. The Downtown Plan, for instance, includes a policy to "use downtown <br />development tools and incentives to encourage development that provides character and density <br />downtown." <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br />The council may approve the amendments as recommended, may alter them, or may choose to not <br />approve the amendments. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2004 Council Agendas\M040913\S0409134.doc <br /> <br /> <br />