My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 02/13/06 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2006
>
CC Minutes - 02/13/06 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:28:27 AM
Creation date
4/20/2006 1:57:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/13/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
College Hill Reservoir. He maintained that EWEB staff was wrong and the reservoir did not need to be <br />fenced because of an exception included in 1990 legislation. He maintained that fences were irrelevant to <br />the security issues. He met with EWEB several times to provide feedback, and the commissioners had <br />invited solutions from the neighbors. Mr. Grosscup said that staff was less receptive to the neighborhood’s <br />proposals. He believed that closing the reservoir would have a profound impact on the community. Mr. <br />Grosscup asserted that issues that affected neighborhood, such as open space and the unique historic <br />character of the site, mandated City involvement in the issue. He noted that EWEB commissioners would <br />hear a proposal from EWEB staff in April, so time was of the essence. <br /> <br />Mr. Grosscup acknowledged that it would be helpful if he understood the relationship between EWEB and <br />the City with regard to the ownership and management of the property in question. <br /> <br />David Sonnichsen <br />, 2435 Skyline Boulevard, noted that Oregon Transportation Commission member Randy <br />Papé stated at the February 2006 Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC) meeting that public opposition to <br />ramps at I-5 influenced ODOT against the idea. More would be known after the council discussion. He <br />said the Walnut Station Study referred to Franklin Boulevard as a gateway to the City. However, he <br />believed the University of Oregon’s plans for its property on Franklin Boulevard did not create a gateway <br />but rather another downtown “all to itself.” He noted the recent staff presentation regarding the Whole <br />Foods development, during which staff referred to that as a gateway. He suggested the result would be that <br />Franklin Boulevard was a “gateway to a gateway.” <br /> <br />Mr. Sonnichsen suggested the new bridge at Franklin Boulevard without pillars in the river could be a <br />beautiful new gateway between Eugene and Springfield but he did not think it could be beautiful if it had <br />ramps attached to it. He noted the many people who would visit Eugene and use the Prefontaine Trail <br />during the 2008 Olympic Trials and suggested a new bridge with ramps would sully that area, which he <br />believed should be protected. <br /> <br />nd <br />Jana Jackson <br />, 1012 East 22 Avenue, suggested that it would be useful if the City Council and mayor <br />listened to the people of Eugene. She attended a recent workshop on violence and youth, and heard a <br />suggestion that youth be listened to so they knew they were heard. Ms. Jackson suggested the council do the <br />same. She said that the council should respect the will of the voters, and cited as a classic example of a <br />lack of respect the council’s actions with regard to the West Eugene Parkway. She pointed out that <br />residents voted for the parkway twice and against an expensive advisory study and the council acted in <br />opposition to that. The result was that people did not feel heard and became frustrated. She asked why the <br />community’s youth should follow the law, given that example. She cited the Santa Clara sewer assessment <br />issue and City’s foreclosure on a home, which she found abusive and an example of why people questioned <br />why they should follow the law if the City did not. <br /> <br />Ms. Jackson referred to the City’s Land Use Code, which allowed passive “yeses” to prevail in the case of <br />the South Eugene Historic District and rewarded people’s ignorance and passivity. The code did not reward <br />those residents who fought hard to protect their investments in their homes. She said “no means no.” <br /> <br />Molly Dobbs <br />, 1125 Jackson Street, asserted that the parking structure being proposed for the Whole Foods <br />development was “not in line with the vision of downtown.” She wanted the City to extend the Parks Blocks <br />to create a connection to the river. She shared a proposal to create underground parking based on the Salem <br />Civic Center. Ms. Dobbs asked the City to meet with the students and consider alternatives to the proposed <br />garage. She believed the site of the proposed Whole Foods development was a perfect site to start the Parks <br />Blocks extension and live up to the City’s logo regarding the arts and outdoors. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 13, 2006 Page 5 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.