My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 02/13/06 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2006
>
CC Minutes - 02/13/06 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:28:27 AM
Creation date
4/20/2006 1:57:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/13/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mark Gillem <br />, 1799 Fairmount Boulevard, Ms. Dobbs’ professor, advocated for the proposal put forth by <br />Ms. Dobbs, which met many of the City’s goals for downtown, including the connection for the waterfront <br />and an increase in downtown parks space. He said the proposed parking structure would “stand in the way” <br />of connecting the Parks Blocks to the river. The students had put much thought into how parking could be <br />accommodated. He offered suggestions for underground parking at a cost of about $27,000 per space. <br />Approximately 100 to 250 spaces could be accommodated. Mr. Gilham said there was a real need for an <br />integrated parks system, which he believed the connection would help to create. <br /> <br />Amanda Pecretu, <br /> 1157 Monroe Street, Apartment B, expressed support for Ms. Dobbs’ proposal, saying <br />that people found parks and open space valuable to Eugene’s quality of life. The Parks, Recreation, and <br />Open Space Comprehensive Plan identified the area downtown as statistically underserved by parks and <br />advocated for planning for park needs prior to need. The plan also emphasized the importance of neighbor- <br />hood parks to mixed-use areas. Her design studio was willing to work with the City on design alternatives <br />that accommodated Whole Foods and the public good. <br /> <br />Jen Evans <br />, 1591 High Street, #1, shared examples of the type of parking the students were advocating for <br />and asked the City to work with the design studio. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy noted that time for the Public Forum had expired. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Bettman, moved to hear the remainder of those <br />who signed up to speak in the Public Forum and to extend time for the meeting if necessary. <br />Roll call vote; the vote on the motion was a 4:4 tie; Mr. Papé, Councilor Poling, Councilor <br />Solomon, and Councilor Pryor voting no, and Councilor Taylor, Councilor Kelly, Councilor <br />Bettman, and Councilor Ortiz voting yes. The mayor cast a vote in favor of the motion and <br />it passed on a final vote of 5:4. <br /> <br />Ken Avery <br />, 2648 Harris Street, also a member of the design studio, emphasized that there were alternatives <br />to the parking design put forth by Whole Foods that accomplished the same goals. He suggested a mixed- <br />use development that included housing was one such approach and would result in a better gateway to <br />downtown than a parking structure. He believed such an approach could increase land values. <br /> <br />th <br />Laurie Segal <br />, 1210 East 29 Place, brought the recent annexation of the River Ridge property into the City <br />of Eugene to the council’s attention. She said she attempted to follow the process, which she characterized <br />as “relatively fast,” given the staff report was issued January 3, 2006, and the commission hearing occurred <br />a month later on February 2, 2006. Ms. Segal had asked the Lane County Local Government Boundary <br />Commission to extend the time for public comment so more information could be submitted in the record, <br />but the boundary commission declined to do so and approved the annexation. <br /> <br />Ms. Segal said her research brought several documents to light that raised interesting questions. She hoped <br />the council could respond and there might be some discussion about the issue. One document was an <br />irrevocable petition for public improvements filed in March 1988 that stated it accompanied the land and <br />was effective for 20 years. A determination of the need to execute an annexation agreement was filed in <br />May 1988; that was pursuant to a zone change ordinance adopted by the County that required, pursuant to <br />the zone change approval, annexation. Ms. Segal said in May 1988, a conditional use permit was approved <br />by the City of Eugene for the site. She did not understand why the City took that action if the property was <br />outside the city limits. Following that, another conditional use permit for a golf course application was <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 13, 2006 Page 6 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.