|
. ~. ~4UG 19 '04 09:Z5AM LgAglJE OF OR CITIES P 18/33
<br />
<br />;,, , ,, ,, to document the site-specific d~isions ~d con~fions on a p~cel b~ p~l basis. B~ed on o~ "
<br />~ '. .,:, ":' 'e~fien6e mse~ng land use h~sto~ for l~d use reviews, zoning conf~afion lette~, ~d
<br />,,. , , , ,~p,~nor ep~fions, ~ese costs could be si~fficant, esp~ially considering the umber of
<br />' ' ,. ,: , 'chgfiges a~ting a ~6pe~y over a len~ of time ~at would each needto be r~emched ~d
<br /> ,' ',; ' ~ed. Another tmpo~ant cost hctor concerns app~sfls. At a ~mum, one or mom
<br />·, ~ ,,, , ~ cgh~gct appr~sers would be ret~ed by ~e City to verify &e l~downer's apprise. Apprhsal
<br />"' : , .~ , ' co~B,~ depen~ng on ~e location, potenfifl ~e, vflue, histo~, size of ~e prope~, whether
<br />':', , "~ it~, v~mt l~d, or rqukes a ch~ged scope of work. hde~ndent private con~t appr~sal
<br /> · ~ ' ,'" 'm~ts,would be substm~fl. Appr~sers ch~ge $90-$120 per hour. An appr~sfl for residenfi~
<br /> " ', prgp~
<br /> ' ~ ':"~tb es r e ~om $400~I',000 in t~ical Po~land n~ghborhoo~ and much ~gher in ~e
<br /> ,,:' ' ' :' wn for mul~s~u M~ ~se residences. Commerci~ or indus~
<br /> ".' , *,~ ~ prope~es r~ge from
<br /> " .... $2 to $i0,000 ~d at ~e h~er end of ~e rage in the cen~ city ~a ($7,0~-$10,000)
<br />
<br /> ' "' ~ '4. "Compensation cos~ to pay for successful property owner clams and awed of a~ome~
<br />
<br />';' . .~' i&", Po~ntial lost local prope~ ~x revenue may r~ult from reducfioqs in ~e f~r ma, ket value
<br />',",'',"; ":" 'qf ~rqp'e~es adja~en~ to cl~ants whgse cl~m results in a w~ver. These he.by
<br />,, , ' ~o~d'~ ~e~ prope~y value aff~ted by incompatible development where zo~g r~u~ments
<br /> '" , ': .... h'ave,~en wmved_ ~e pro.ffles would have to fffm~vely appeal to ~e county
<br /> ,' "' ~s~or to have thek assess~ valu& lower~ on ~e t~ rolls. For exmple, hom~ sit~ in a
<br /> "" " ,., resl3~nfifl,zone ne~ a Prope~y wffh wmved re~lafions fllowing a eonve~ence store to locate
<br /> ,,, ' ih ~eit ~dst, %i~ no aceo~odafion for ~affic congestion, ~'~fic ~ety, or any off-str~t
<br /> , ;, · , P~ag r~emenB c~uld ex~fience a d~line in propeay v~ue.
<br />
<br />.... ,, .' ? '~e P~lmd Zoning Code is' developed t~ou~ extensive citizen input ~d pmic/pahon ~at
<br /> ,"~ ~~:~e developmefl~ ri~U of propeay ownem M~ the n~d to pro~ect s~o~din uses .from
<br /> ~)~m~ of ~e~ghboh~g uses ~p~i~ly incompa~ble uses. In so doing, ~e Zonin*
<br /> :' P~~ me pro ea v~ues of ~I r ' . . ~ ~ e
<br /> ,,; ,,,: .,., :. _ . . P .Y p ope~ and prowdes ce~tmnty to existing l~downers as wh
<br /> :. .maT,~ ~lowea on ~mr property ~d the prope~y of their nei~bors, at
<br />
<br />· . :o '(, , ~h~,g~'~nis~afiv~ costs for ~fiafive 36 for both "pre-cl~m inqm~es" md "cl~m application
<br /> ",, :.' ~rp~s~ng" alone could be substantial. The Zoning Code o~en contorts mul~ple reg~afions on
<br /> · ':' .,., gn~ p~ff~el. Fqr ex~ple, re.la, ohs c~ ~ver allowable uses, b~e zone development st~d~ds,
<br />
<br /> "', , ~rb~n,'~ign regulations, overlays for sensitive envkonment~ ~e~, noir, ~lomed floor are~
<br />
<br /> ~'~mended; often sever~ times in one ye~ to k~p up with charting loe~ circumstances,
<br /> ,- :~ ~ ~emB~e stmdhr~ ~d proced~s, to account for emer~ng redevelopment, to respond to
<br /> ~:,, ~6'f~er~ po~cies and regulations ~d accomplish other new initiative. Detem~ng a point in
<br /> :"'" ,, ' ¢~ ~heh,~ set 6f regulations is most favorable to a claimer, based on ances~ fi~ts, could be
<br /> ' ;" '~' 0~e'~d ve~ time consu~ng.
<br />
<br />', ~[ f~ ~0mCt clem' whether ~e ct~m~t could base his cl~m solely on one aspect of a complex
<br /> ,' ~.': pack~ge, gf'm~afions adopted at a p~int in time. Most'often, ch~ges ~e a combinahon
<br /> ~l~fl6ns ~th~t may both increase ~d decrease development pomnfl~. For exmple, fl~e City
<br /> : C6~cfl'g r~nt acaons ~ ~oah~est Po~land, rezoning indusffially zoned prope~es to Cenmal
<br /> ' ' ~. ~io~h~fit ~d) gmaa~ incre~ed the number of uses ~low~ on those properties, while also
<br /> ,. ,,,'~PlT~hg ~6me resections C.g. ~owing residenO~ ~d commerchl ~es that hadn't been allowed
<br /> ',', ~fom, w~l~ resetting ~utdoor storage uses). In ad~0on, ~e EXd zone
<br /> ' ' has height resections
<br />,, , )[,~". ~ ~d,hot,apply pmviously in ~e indt~M'~ae since fndus~al ~es do not generally seek
<br /> ,,,, , h~fiofi~ 'height. This siiuaflon gives rise to a question of whether a claim could be b~ed.solelY on
<br />
<br />
<br />
|