|
, ;,~ '"' '~ AUG 19 '04 09:25AM LEAGUE OF OR CITIES
<br /> ' "· ' : P.1D/BB
<br />
<br />~ ' ,, :i the' outd6ot storage use or height resections wi~out t~ng into conside~on the fu~ p~kage of
<br /> ' ~' '~ r~to~,ghi~ges that inc~ase both fle~bi~ and ~velopment potenfi~ for ~e property owner.
<br /> , ,, ', ~ '.:,'D~i'~e prope~y owner get to choose only the m~lation ~at may have the potenfi~ to ~duce
<br /> ·: ,." :,,. ' value absent ~e other regu]ato~ ch~ges,where v~ue may accrue ~om an incre~e in development
<br />'"~ ,, ,'fi'g~?', '
<br /> :,," ,. ~_ It'ap~,,,, ~t the burden of proof to respond to a el~ f~ls to ~e city~ yet it i~ not c]e~ ~at the
<br /> ci~'c~d eh~:ge a De to coYe~ its co,ts to va~date cl~. The Initiative
<br /> ' ,":. ', ~hic~ ~ el~mant may go ~r~dy to eo~, ~d ~ ~is i~s~ace it would ~ the city's obligation and
<br /> ,. , .~r~. ,, ,t~,respond, with rese~ch an~ an~ys~s as well ~ leg~
<br /> · ":, .... ~i~a~q~ '36 ~fi~ a variety of l~d use ac~ons, w~eh is defin~ to iac]ude "~aaspo~a~on
<br /> ~,or~n~". Ii is not clear whether ~is implicates l~ ~spo~afion improve~en~ finance
<br /> ~'m~6~, ~uch ~, enactment of system development chm'ges to pay for tr~spoaation imvrovemen~
<br /> ~" 0r'~d'cr~flon of local improvement districts to pay for system ~provement projects. ~ni~ative 36
<br /> ,, ,. .... : ~fi~es, l~d use re~la~on in a way that may also baclude ~1 fo~s of development stand~ such
<br /> ,~ , ~-,~q~e ~ound in the Ciw's sto~water manual and erosion consol standm.~.
<br />
<br /> . An Oeto~r ~000 repoa ev~u~ing the ~pacts of Meas~e 7 prepped By ECO No.west used the
<br /> ' ~'~i$~,~['Pd~and Neighborhood Proposal of Southwest ~ one of nine e~se studi~. ~e study is
<br /> ,? tried, "F~cal Impacts of Ballot Me~ure 7 of State and ~caI Government.t: An A~lysis of
<br /> ,~, '~cted'R~gut~ions" idenfifi~ 90 state ~d local government acdons ~at could ~gger
<br /> .: ' co~p~tion. ~e repo~ found ~at ~e nine c~e ~udies resulted in $946 billion in compznsa~on
<br /> ',',, ,, ~, aI,~st ~Not6J this was not the final projosal adopted by ~e City Coun~l with the SouDwest
<br /> 0~' ,, ' qommu~i~Plan).
<br />
<br /> : ' ', ' ~a! a~Ofi, did City Council ~ke to p'repare for Ba~ot M~ure 7 in 2000 that ~e instructive
<br /> .,:'"' " ' uafl~e I~tiative g~67 '
<br />
<br />:,,, ,. ":PoltS~ag ~assage of B~lot Me.ute 7 in November 2000, the City Council adopt~ a'two page
<br />,.,, : o~i?~e d~h~g finings and en~ting ~ new City Code; ~apter 5.75. ~hs ~on was t~en to
<br /> ",, , h~e ~ new claims procedure in place to ~ze potenfi~ liability ~sing from fmlure to process
<br /> : "":: ,, cl~deq~a~ely. Chapter 5.75 included eight sections, including P~ose, DeriSions, Claim for
<br /> ,, Comp6nsation, Fo~ of Cl~m. ~ouat of C]~m ~essing Fee, Cl~m Completeness and
<br /> ,, ,,, ,~ Acbep~6~ f~r Filing, Sched~in~ ~d No,ce, of C~ty Council H~ing, City Council He~ng and
<br /> ,, A~o~. ~e new chapter det~s 15 specific elements necess~y to file a clx. Staff review would
<br /> ',: ' 'r~?~ ~gbstantia~ st~f ti~e and specific ex~se
<br />
<br /> " . Wd:~fi~end that you direct the planning and development bureaus ~d the Office of
<br /> "" ' M~gement, and Fin~ce with assist~c~ from the Office of Gove~ent Rela~ons and the City
<br /> " .... ~t'i~y':s ~ce, to be~n a det~led analys~s of the meas~e as w~ done fox a Ballot Measure
<br /> "" , ,~e,p~ose of ~i's an~ysis would be to assess the impact on revennes, on planing and
<br />" '~y~lop~eflt progra~ and off work pro~a~s recently approved in more det~l. We recommend
<br /> ',.',, , , ,,:,' ~at ~s' an~jsis co~ence i~ediately and be fo~d~ to you, as it becomes available.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|