Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />At this point, Bill introduced two options: Option A: “Alternates may ‘vote’ assuming they are <br />current with issues and informed” and Option B: “Alternates may not vote.” Discussion <br />continued. <br />Comment: “We could clear up some of this discussion by simply requiring a quorum to be <br />present for decision-making.” <br />Question: “What is the role of the alternate?” <br />Comment: “We should eliminate alternates and just use a quorum system.” <br />Response: “We would have to go back to the CDCA to change rules.” <br />Comment: “Option B is similar to having no alternates.” <br />Comment: “Alternates should not be forced to attend all meetings.” <br /> <br />After a brief discussion about the role of alternates, the committee was instructed to indicate <br />support for the following options. Voting results follow: <br />Option A: “Alternates may ‘vote’ assuming they are current with issues and informed.” <br />(17) <br />Option B: “Alternates may not vote.” (3) <br />Option C: “Eliminate alternates.” (1) <br />Following the vote, committee members were asked to show support using the 5-1 consensus <br />model. Option A passed with the addendum that “Alternates only vote when their permanent <br />member is absent.” <br />Shortly thereafter, the committee was polled for support of the 16/22 person quorum. The <br />quorum rule requires that 16 of the 22 original committee members must be present for the <br />meeting to proceed and for decisions to be made. The committee supported the quorum rule <br />unanimously. More discussion follows. <br />Question: Will there be a schedule to indicate when voting decisions will occur? <br />Response: There will be a roadmap for the process and there will be a sense for when a vote <br />occurs. I’d hate to send people home when a quorum is not present. <br />Comment: As long as the alternates are informed, they should vote. <br />Question: Can we change these rules through consensus if we think the alternate is ill <br />informed? <br />Comment: Flexibility in the schedule is important <br />Comment: It would be convenient to know well ahead of time when the committee will not <br />have meetings scheduled for planning around members’ vacation time. <br /> <br />Communication <br />Following the discussion on decision-making, Bill asked committee members to quickly <br />brainstorm ideas for getting information in and out of the CDCT (to and from the greater <br />neighborhood). Sticky notes were collected for inclusion in the public minutes. These are the <br />initial ideas and suggestions: <br /> <br />In Out <br />Collection box at Wayne Morse Ranch Door to door contact with residents on street <br />Direct conversation with committee member(s) Word of mouth, CDCA meetings, newsletter & <br />mailings <br />Door to door canvass for important issues CDNA newsletter/meetings <br />Post info at Wayne Morse Ranch Council/neighborhood newsletter <br />Page 19 of 27 <br />