My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 9: Resolution Approving PROS Project and Priority Plan
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 05/08/06 Meeting
>
Item 9: Resolution Approving PROS Project and Priority Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:56:54 PM
Creation date
5/4/2006 10:39:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/8/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
It is typical of Parks and Open Space planning processes to only incorporate <br />lands which are owned and therefore controlled by the individual jurisdiction. <br />The inclusion of private recreation facilities complicates the inventory of lands <br />and resources because the mission of a private facility owner is often different <br />than that of a municipality. In the case of both Willamalane Park and Recreation <br />District and the City of Portland, inventory acreages are limited to those lands <br />which are owned by the jurisdictions. School facilities are included in the facility <br />analysis, but the acreage is not included. This is consistent with Eugene’s <br />methodology. <br /> <br />With regards to the issue of projects located outside of Eugene’s Urban Growth <br />Boundary, currently, the City of Eugene can, and does, own property outside of <br />its city limits and urban growth boundary. For example, the Eugene Airport and <br />many segments of the Ridgeline Park system are located outside of the City’s <br />limits. When acquiring and developing property that lies outside of Eugene’s <br />jurisdiction, the City is required to follow the zoning and land use regulations of <br />the appropriate governing jurisdictions. <br /> <br />Adoption of the Project and Priority Plan does not amount to the City exercising <br />any governmental authority outside of the UGB or outside of the City’s limits. <br />As noted in the PROS Comprehensive Plan, the document has no regulatory <br />effect on land not under the City’s jurisdictional authority. Neither the PROS <br />Comprehensive Plan or the Project and Priority Plan are intended to have any <br />legal or regulatory effect for land located outside City limits. They are <br />strategy/planning documents that are intended as a guide for the City as it <br />moves forward to meet the recreational and park needs of the City’s residents. <br /> <br />Project and Priority Plan- May 8, 2006 <br />Public Testimony Response Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.