My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3A - Minutes Approval
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-10/11/04Mtg
>
Item 3A - Minutes Approval
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:07:20 PM
Creation date
10/6/2004 3:09:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/11/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Torrey reminded the council that the community had directed the City through its vote not to study <br />another alternative. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey asked City Manager Taylor to write a letter to ODOT asking if the agency would participate <br />with Eugene and Lane County in an alternative plan with staff and funding for the area east of the Beltline if <br />the parkway was determined to no longer be a viable project. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey solicited a fourth round of council comments. <br /> <br />Speaking to Mr. Papa's comments, Mr. Kelly said there were other %ack of the envelope" alternatives that <br />arose out of the design charette, including the final recommendation made by charette participants that <br />ODOT issue a record of no decision and not build the parkway. He suggested it was not possible to develop <br />viable alternatives in a two-day charette, and the only way the community would come to a resolution for the <br />west Eugene area was to give the area the same level of intense consideration that had gone into the <br />parkway. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman requested a memorandum from legal counsel discussing how the changed project would relate <br />to all the past legal and public processes that had been gone through locally, and if the manager could <br />change the nature of the project through the MOU or if TransPlan must be amended. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman agreed with the mayor that the community missed many opportunities to address safety and <br />operational efficiency issues in west Eugene because it had committed to the parkway. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman recalled that half a parkway was heavily favored at the charette, but the State representatives <br />%hot it down" because they could not guarantee the State could participate in the cost of such a project and <br />because it did not fulfill the State's purpose and need for the parkway. Now the State was proposing a <br />different project that probably would not compare favorably with some of the alternatives previously on the <br />table. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 1:25 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Dennis M. Taylor <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Kimberly Young) <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 22, 2004 Page 10 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.